Tapate50
Well-known member
It usually doesn’tDid you even listen to his speech? It's not saying what you think it does.
It usually doesn’tDid you even listen to his speech? It's not saying what you think it does.
I’d be afraid if the paid web of protesters getting found out too
Sure. Would you agree that the actions being claimed here would be wrong though?I wouldn't take anything the New York Times or from the MSM in general as gospel.
lol the fbi agent that looks over my memes and social media likely has to turn it off after a few minutes. It’s all the same stuffEnjoy your police state, bro.
They’re not just asking to look at social media feeds. They’re allegedly attempting to force companies to give identifying information to them for criticisms of ICE. Substitute ICE for COVID vaccines and I’m sure you can see why that is concerning.lol the fbi agent that looks over my memes and social media likely has to turn it off after a few minutes. It’s all the same stuff
They’re not just asking to look at social media feeds. They’re allegedly attempting to force companies to give identifying information to them for criticisms of ICE. Substitute ICE for COVID vaccines and I’m sure you can see why that is concerning.
I have largely agreed with the right that the government overstepped on this.And you guys silenced those voices with glee !
Turns out my vote was justified given that the Republicans clearly never actually cared about it.You still voted the same so You might as well stay lockstep
Sure. Would you agree that the actions being claimed here would be wrong though?
The United States is currently having social media companies help them build a database of dissenters, but go off Chief.Canada going the way of Great Britain and prosecuting speech online
Yeah they gone
The United States is currently having social media companies help them build a database of dissenters, but go off Chief.
The United States is currently having social media companies help them build a database of dissenters, but go off Chief.