January 6th insurrection thread...

If Peter Strozk was brought onto the Mueller investigation because of his anti-Trump statements then you might have a point. Strozk was kicked off the investigation. Cyber Ninjas was hired because they were partisan. I care about Durham being partisan simply to show the rights hypocrisy, other than that I dont care if Durham is the biggest Trump brown noser or thinks Hillary is the devil. I dont see how what Strokz did was in any way comparable to what the FBI did to Hillary 10 days before the election that according to the IG Horowitz report was politically motivated. She dropped 5 points in the poll after that. Can you show me anything Strozk did that had that kind of effect on the 2016 election?
 
Hahaha. Strozk was kicked off the team because the texts were made public. They all knew what his bias was while he was running effectively point on the investigation.
 
There is just so much documented evidence of wide spread voter fraud. State by state there have been large irregularities identified. The only way to prove anything is though a canvassing which is what the Biden regime specifically has instituted threatening decrees to anyone who dares perform one.
 
You need to read what Strozk said. He didn't say "I", he said "we". He also said he had an insurance plan to get it done. I think we all know what that insurance plan was. Point out to me where Horowitz said that was politically motivated. If they wanted to get Hillary all they had to do was charge her for deleting files AFTER being given a subpoena not to. If you or I did that we would be sitting in jail.
 
It’s a fantasy world to even suggest that the Democrat investigation of Trump wasn’t fully partisan in nature. They turned their head away from the origins of the dossier knowing exactly how fraudulent it was. Same thing with the alpha bank story. You have sneer fbi lawyers materially changing emails to fool fisa judges.

It was all a planned coup since Trump won.
 
cajunrevenge said:
So you would agree if Durham had made anti-Hillary statements his investigation is null and void?
Click to expand...

I'm okay with negative comments. I'm concerned when a high ranking member of the FBI says they are going to go after the POTUS and they have an insurance plan to get it done. It didn't seem to end with Strzok's firing.
 
thethe said:
It’s a fantasy world to even suggest that the Democrat investigation of Trump wasn’t fully partisan in nature. They turned their head away from the origins of the dossier knowing exactly how fraudulent it was. Same thing with the alpha bank story. You have sneer fbi lawyers materially changing emails to fool fisa judges.

It was all a planned coup since Trump won.
Click to expand...

Exactly. The left points out it was just one guy doing this or something. How could he do something this big without the other members of the FBI not knowing about it?
 
Garmel said:
You need to read what Strozk said. He didn't say "I", he said "we". He also said he had an insurance plan to get it done. I think we all know what that insurance plan was. Point out to me where Horowitz said that was politically motivated. If they wanted to get Hillary all they had to do was charge her for deleting files AFTER being given a subpoena not to. If you or I did that we would be sitting in jail.
Click to expand...


https://www.salon.com/2019/12/12/do...anti-clinton-fbi-leaks-continues-to-this-day/


https://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/


Heres the story on the emails deleted after the subpoena. There was no case to make against Hillary.
 
Garmel said:
I'm okay with negative comments. I'm concerned when a high ranking member of the FBI says they are going to go after the POTUS and they have an insurance plan to get it done. It didn't seem to end with Strzok's firing.
Click to expand...


Werent these comments made before Trump became President. And despite this insurance plan Trump still became President? I fail to see anything Strozk did that impacted Trump in any negative way. Unlike what Comey's announcement of the reopening of the investigation into Hillary did to her. Theres a good chance that announcement made the difference in getting Trump elected but I am supposed to be upset about one investigator not liking Trump? Mueller bent over backwards to be non-partisan in his investigation.
 
Garmel said:
Exactly. The left points out it was just one guy doing this or something. How could he do something this big without the other members of the FBI not knowing about it?
Click to expand...


Was Strokz fired for having the bias or for them wanting to avoid the appearance of a bias? If someone is investigating someone for child pornography and makes derogatory statements about the suspect it does not make the suspect innocent of child pornography. I wasnt aware people could only be investigated by the BFFs.
 
cajunrevenge said:
https://www.salon.com/2019/12/12/do...anti-clinton-fbi-leaks-continues-to-this-day/


https://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/


Heres the story on the emails deleted after the subpoena. There was no case to make against Hillary.
Click to expand...

From one of the articles. "The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena."

She did it and they let her walk.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Werent these comments made before Trump became President. And despite this insurance plan Trump still became President? I fail to see anything Strozk did that impacted Trump in any negative way. Unlike what Comey's announcement of the reopening of the investigation into Hillary did to her. Theres a good chance that announcement made the difference in getting Trump elected but I am supposed to be upset about one investigator not liking Trump? Mueller bent over backwards to be non-partisan in his investigation.
Click to expand...

After he was president. We didn't know about this until well into the investigation.
 
Garmel said:
From one of the articles. "The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena."

She did it and they let her walk.
Click to expand...


Keep reading. Someone was supposed to delete it. Later realized they didnt delete it. Then deleted those emails. If I remember it all correctly the guy was caught based on a reddit post asking about Bleachbit. There is a good case against that guy if they wanted to charge him. I am not going to defend Hillary, but unless the facts as we know them change there was no case to make against Hillary Clinton for deleting those emails after the subpoena.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Keep reading. Someone was supposed to delete it. Later realized they didnt delete it. Then deleted those emails. If I remember it all correctly the guy was caught based on a reddit post asking about Bleachbit. There is a good case against that guy if they wanted to charge him. I am not going to defend Hillary, but unless the facts as we know them change there was no case to make against Hillary Clinton for deleting those emails after the subpoena.
Click to expand...

I read it too. Whole lot of MSM spin. You notice that she also could have been punished for having an illegal server but that was overlooked by the FBI too.

"FBI Director James Comey said in a July 2016 statement that the FBI investigation "found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.""

The FBI does their own spin. It doesn't matter the intention or not. It happened and they let her slide on purpose.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
I read it too. Whole lot of MSM spin. You notice that she also could have been punished for having an illegal server but that was overlooked by the FBI too.

"FBI Director James Comey said in a July 2016 statement that the FBI investigation "found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.""

The FBI does their own spin. It doesn't matter the intention or not. It happened and they let her slide on purpose.
Click to expand...

Let me make another point. If this was Trump who had done the exact same thing and a low level employee had come out and said my bad, I deleted it (to cover for the boss), you wouldn't buy into that ****, Cajun any more than I do this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top