January 6th insurrection thread...

Jaw said:
Authoritarian is a weird way to describe a party that's turned more to oppose quotas, oppose censorship, favor labor friendly tariffs, retain some level of state sovereignty, oppose vaccine and testing mandates, etc. Way too many on the left are using authoritarian when what they mean is "stands in the way of what I want." I know there's been some success with redefining words to fit the progressive ideology, but you can't expect it to work every time.
Click to expand...

I want them to continue.

Just like being accused of being a 'racist' has lost its impact these types of attacks are going the same route.

And as we learn more and more how 2020 was stolen we truly know who the opponents of democracy are.
 
Last edited:
Jaw said:
Authoritarian is a weird way to describe a party that's turned more to oppose quotas, oppose censorship, favor labor friendly tariffs, retain some level of state sovereignty, oppose vaccine and testing mandates, etc. Way too many on the left are using authoritarian when what they mean is "stands in the way of what I want." I know there's been some success with redefining words to fit the progressive ideology, but you can't expect it to work every time.
Click to expand...



Hol up, since when have Republicans been against censoring. Their last President and likely nominee in 2024 wanted to censor SNL.....
 
Jaw said:
Authoritarian is a weird way to describe a party that's turned more to oppose quotas, oppose censorship, favor labor friendly tariffs, retain some level of state sovereignty, oppose vaccine and testing mandates, etc. Way too many on the left are using authoritarian when what they mean is "stands in the way of what I want." I know there's been some success with redefining words to fit the progressive ideology, but you can't expect it to work every time.
Click to expand...

This Fred Wellman idiot doesn't realize that people aren't commemorating the J6 event but are protesting the treatment of J6 prisoners. Most of them were just trespassers who are still in jail after a year. The kicker is many of these same people were invited in by the capital police. Weakest coup evah!

However, anyone who wasn't peaceful and rioted needs to be punished.
 
Last edited:
Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
7h
Ashli Babbitt should have complied, isn't that what you dip****s tell me

every time cops shoot some black woman sleeping in her own bed
 
57Brave said:
Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
7h
Ashli Babbitt should have complied, isn't that what you dip****s tell me

every time cops shoot some black woman sleeping in her own bed
Click to expand...

One of the weirdest positions of today's communists is how they support an injustice because a different injustice happened to someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
it is history.
you know, something that actually-verifiably happened.

Glad to see you stay in character
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
This Fred Wellman idiot doesn't realize that people aren't commemorating the J6 event but are protesting the treatment of J6 prisoners. Most of them were just trespassers who are still in jail after a year. The kicker is many of these same people were invited in by the capital police. Weakest coup evah!

However, anyone who wasn't peaceful and rioted needs to be punished.
Click to expand...


I guess some may only be guilty of trespassing but doing so broke several other laws like obstructing an official proceeding(I dont recall the exact wording). Those trespassing aided those committing violence because it forced the Capitol police to spread out more. As of January 6th Trump was STILL actively trying to change the results. That he did not succeed does not change the fact he tried to change the results through threats and intimidation. He asked Raffensberger to commit a crime to help him. He threatened Raffensberger with criminal charges if he did not commit that crime. The whole thing was a coup attempt. The rioters were just pawns Trump used to try to delay the certification and they did manage to delay the certification. What I would focus on with Trump is that if everything he said before the riot was true, those are legitimate reasons to do what the rioters did. Trump had many of these people so brainwashed they thought they were going to walk down to the capitol and the police were going to help them.
 
thethe said:
All justified when looking at all the documented fraud.
Click to expand...


There is a legal process for that. You would have to identify each and every vote and who they voted for and then switch it. Theres no such thing as Raffensberger just adding 11,780 votes to Trump. If he isnt arrested almost immediately after making such announcement he would be sued and a judge would order him to not count the fake votes.
 
cajunrevenge said:
I guess some may only be guilty of trespassing but doing so broke several other laws like obstructing an official proceeding(I dont recall the exact wording). Those trespassing aided those committing violence because it forced the Capitol police to spread out more. As of January 6th Trump was STILL actively trying to change the results. That he did not succeed does not change the fact he tried to change the results through threats and intimidation. He asked Raffensberger to commit a crime to help him. He threatened Raffensberger with criminal charges if he did not commit that crime. The whole thing was a coup attempt. The rioters were just pawns Trump used to try to delay the certification and they did manage to delay the certification. What I would focus on with Trump is that if everything he said before the riot was true, those are legitimate reasons to do what the rioters did. Trump had many of these people so brainwashed they thought they were going to walk down to the capitol and the police were going to help them.
Click to expand...

Trump didn't threaten anyone. Quit listening to MSM crap.
 
"And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal, it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know what they did and you're not reporting it. That's a criminal, that's a criminal offense. And you can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that's a big risk."
 
what if he made him " an offer he couldn't refuse " sheeess
the whole world has been watching the Godfather for 50 years now ---- one could drive a truck between those lines

Trump aint smart, or rich , or clever . Oh, I take that back , he was clever enough to recognize that if he got on TV and unapologetically yelled racist scit
that he would immediately get 30-35 % of the vote.
The people he sneers and looks down on

I thought back in '92 had Bill Clinton just up and called Jesse Jackson a ****** he would win the nomination and the general in a landslide.
But know what ?

BC didnt take the bait
//////

you can look all that up
 
Last edited:
Jesus ****ing christ. The audio is publicly available. You tell me what part of saying Raffensberger is risking criminal liability for not doing what Trump wants is in any way shape or form the truth? Let me ask you this. Trump runs in 2024. He wins the a blue state by 30k votes giving him the electoral college win. Biden calls up the Democrat in that state in Raffensbergers position and says "Hey bro, I heard 40k dead people voted for Trump in your state" and they remove 40k votes from Trump giving Biden the win in that state... You are telling me thats not election fraud? How in the world can you people say you are against election fraud but support the guy who tried to get the vote count changed based on nothing with a shred of evidence.



If "lying" about what someone said is such a big deal to you then I have a LONG list for you.
 
57Brave said:
what if he made him " an offer he couldn't refuse " sheeess
the whole world has been watching the Godfather for 50 years now ---- one could drive a truck between those lines
Click to expand...

Yeah, like you libs use the words "dog whistle" to infer someone is using "racist" language when 99% of the time there's nothing there. You libs see and hear what you want.

Trump wouldn't openly threaten someone with people from both sides of the disagreement being on the phone.
 
what I don't get is just about to a person!!! the people arrested and convicted are telling judges and juries they were duped into going to DC on Jan 6
Duped by Trump.
Duped by Trump like the returning vets at Trump U --- Duped by Trump by contractors in AC--- Duped by Trump by jsut about anyone that has ever followed him.
Seemingly smart people
Critical thinkers if you will

yet, people here that haven't left their bedroom in years are still spouting what this huckster sells them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top