January 6th insurrection thread...

Epps literally keyed the first man that broke the barrier.

You could very easily make the argument that Epps and his accomplices initiated the whole riot.

If you actually care and were being honest (you aren’t) you’d read the revolver piece on Epps and his accomplices and then would understand what J6 really was. An intelligence operation so that the electors wouldn’t be sent back to the States were all the obvious fraud would be investigated.
 
[tw]1551534468443381760[/tw]

It was revealing how many cowards and frauds revealed themselves in light of the clear 2020 steal. Don’t think it was stolen? Find the most seasoned auditor or data analysis that’s looked at the information and ask them.
 
Garmel said:
He makes a strong point. How many more times will the J6 narrative change?

[tw]1551186857014091776[/tw]
Click to expand...


The narrative hasn't changed. They are focusing on different aspects. Do you need me to do a deep dive on the ever changing election fraud narratives?
 
thethe said:
Epps literally keyed the first man that broke the barrier.

You could very easily make the argument that Epps and his accomplices initiated the whole riot.

If you actually care and were being honest (you aren’t) you’d read the revolver piece on Epps and his accomplices and then would understand what J6 really was. An intelligence operation so that the electors wouldn’t be sent back to the States were all the obvious fraud would be investigated.
Click to expand...



I am all for charging Epps. Just dont cry when he is not convicted like the Sussman hoax that the clapping seals ate up.



Would you like an avatar bet on whether Epps is an FBI agent or was an informant BEFORE J6? Not that there's any amount of proof you would accept. It's just so spiracy theory after conspiracy.
 
Sussman was such a hoax. A hoax where Sussman was proven to have lied and the proof is on a cell phone transcript. It's in black and white that was shown to all of us. Yet, somehow Trump extorted Ukraine when the transcript doesn't point to that and Zelensky said it didn't happen. The idiocy is amazing.
 
Palmer Report
@PalmerReport
·
1h
The DOJ just had Mike Pence’s VP chief of staff Marc Short testify to

a grand jury about January 6th, per multiple major media outlets.

So much for the notion that the DOJ isn’t investigating Trump.

They’re breathing down his neck.
 
The funny thing is what Trump did was perfectly legal. If it wasn't legal the Electoral Act of 2022 wouldn't be happening.
 
57Brave said:
Palmer Report
@PalmerReport
·
1h
The DOJ just had Mike Pence’s VP chief of staff Marc Short testify to

a grand jury about January 6th, per multiple major media outlets.

So much for the notion that the DOJ isn’t investigating Trump.

They’re breathing down his neck.
Click to expand...

One might even say the walls are closing in.

Have they announced the committee on Epstein yet?
 
Garmel said:
The funny thing is what Trump did was perfectly legal. If it wasn't legal the Electoral Act of 2022 wouldn't be happening.
Click to expand...

we are all assumed innocent until proven guilty
perhaps we let a grand jury decide the evidence
and a court of law decide legal and illegal
 
cajunrevenge said:
I am all for charging Epps. Just dont cry when he is not convicted like the Sussman hoax that the clapping seals ate up.



Would you like an avatar bet on whether Epps is an FBI agent or was an informant BEFORE J6? Not that there's any amount of proof you would accept. It's just so spiracy theory after conspiracy.
Click to expand...

What about AFTER? He's either an informant or he cut a deal after the event. The guy incited a riot and should be in prison, not grandmas who did nothing but walk around the capital after being invited in by the capitol police.
 
Garmel said:
What about AFTER? He's either an informant or he cut a deal after the event. The guy incited a riot and should be in prison, not grandmas who did nothing but walk around the capital after being invited in by the capitol police.
Click to expand...

I just dont understand how him informing after the riot fits the narrative you are trying to sell. He cooperated with the investigation afterward, we know that. It's weird that you cry about how these people are treated yet cry that this guy isnt charged. Please show me the people who only trespasses that got more than a slap on the wrist
 
Garmel said:
What about AFTER? He's either an informant or he cut a deal after the event. The guy incited a riot and should be in prison, not grandmas who did nothing but walk around the capital after being invited in by the capitol police.
Click to expand...

I mean there’s enough video evidence to have this man on the stand defending himself for a LONG time at the very least.
 
Garmel said:
Sussman was such a hoax. A hoax where Sussman was proven to have lied and the proof is on a cell phone transcript. It's in black and white that was shown to all of us. Yet, somehow Trump extorted Ukraine when the transcript doesn't point to that and Zelensky said it didn't happen. The idiocy is amazing.
Click to expand...


Cool story bro. Where was this when you were high stepping about the Whitmer plot trial where multiple members pleaded guilty and admitted their guilt. No, consistency isnt your thing.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Cool story bro. Where was this when you were high stepping about the Whitmer plot trial where multiple members pleaded guilty and admitted their guilt. No, consistency isnt your thing.
Click to expand...

The two things are not related. One is where the evidence showed Sussman lied. The other is where people plead guilty to avoid a possible long sentence. I don't know why you can't figure out that innocent people sometimes plead guilty in America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top