So then you should have been pushing for audits from the beginning. There is no inventing something after an investigation takes place.
Well, aside from Russian collusion.
January 6th insurrection thread...
- Thread starter goldfly
- Start date
So then you should have been pushing for audits from the beginning. There is no inventing something after an investigation takes place.
Well, aside from Russian collusion.
And volumes of analytical research indicating potential fraud that would require investigation.
How you went from all in on statistics 5-10 years ago and not understand the basic premise of why many of us want an election audit is beyond me.
You know what the numbers are saying.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
I do. No PhD required.
McCann'sCans
Gwinnett Bound
Whenever one party loses out they want to investigate and get 'all the cards on the table.' When that same party wins, they cry about witch hunts and excessive oversight. Where you get your news determines where you think the witches are and which cards are the real ones. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Servers in maricopa were for some reason moved to a dominion offsite location nightly during the election counts.
Anyone have any idea why that would be needed?
Let’s investigate and hopefully nothing bad is uncovered.
Seeing the beauty of audit in action right here. This is historic.
Anyone have any idea why that would be needed?
Let’s investigate and hopefully nothing bad is uncovered.
Seeing the beauty of audit in action right here. This is historic.
McCann'sCans
Gwinnett Bound
The issue is that an audit requires a credible and independent firm, not a small shop that has already publicly taken sides.
Right now I’ll settle for competency.
Fraud can not be created.
If it exists it will be clear and supportable.
Runnin
Well-known member
It's really beautiful how a company who knows nothing about auditing elections rounding up a bunch of wingnuts who know nothing about auditing elections being allowed access to actual voter ballots against election law and norms. I'm sure this will all work out though.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Sharing the rapist i see. Classic.
sturg33
I
First of all... wut?
Second of all, glad you are about to start calling out your boys goldy and cajun for their pushing of the pedo project lol
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
zito, if you'd like to call me out for using tweets from republicans calling out ****ty republicans that had a ****ty republican in their group and is no longer part of it
Go for it
you can even use the beyond dumb nickname the really really smart guy came up with if you'd like
i won't mind
don't let that distract you though from the really stupid sources of news the fraud uses though and would rather deflect to something else. thanks
Go for it
you can even use the beyond dumb nickname the really really smart guy came up with if you'd like
i won't mind
don't let that distract you though from the really stupid sources of news the fraud uses though and would rather deflect to something else. thanks
Last edited:
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
When Trump’s Next Coup Happens, the Republican Party Will Fully Support It
Understanding those beliefs is key to following the party through the ongoing purge of Liz Cheney. The party’s middle faction initially sympathized with Cheney’s anger at Trump for his reckless and cringe-inducing effort to goad a mob into storming the Capitol on January 6. Putting Mike Pence’s life in danger is not a stunt any of them take lightly. But now the balance of their anger has tilted against Cheney. She refuses to let this thing go, and she is putting the party’s messaging at risk.
The document that most clearly expresses the mainstream Republican view is a column by National Review’s Dan McLaughlin. To begin with, McLaughlin lays out the party Establishment’s view of the stakes: While the dispute is “dressed up as disagreements over issues and approaches,” it “is actually almost entirely about the personality and character of Donald J. Trump.” Trump is a boor and a sleaze, but there’s no larger principle at stake.
Next, McLaughlin insists that Trump’s embarrassing behavior is all behind them. “Cheney has made herself a symbol of inter-Republican resistance to Trump’s post-election temper tantrum, to his fables about a stolen election, and to his role in provoking the Capitol riot — all of which is fair to call out, but all of which is now in the past.”
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/art...cheney-purge-riot-insurrection-democracy.html
Weird
Again, the same talking points I hear here from someone
Color me shocked
Understanding those beliefs is key to following the party through the ongoing purge of Liz Cheney. The party’s middle faction initially sympathized with Cheney’s anger at Trump for his reckless and cringe-inducing effort to goad a mob into storming the Capitol on January 6. Putting Mike Pence’s life in danger is not a stunt any of them take lightly. But now the balance of their anger has tilted against Cheney. She refuses to let this thing go, and she is putting the party’s messaging at risk.
The document that most clearly expresses the mainstream Republican view is a column by National Review’s Dan McLaughlin. To begin with, McLaughlin lays out the party Establishment’s view of the stakes: While the dispute is “dressed up as disagreements over issues and approaches,” it “is actually almost entirely about the personality and character of Donald J. Trump.” Trump is a boor and a sleaze, but there’s no larger principle at stake.
Next, McLaughlin insists that Trump’s embarrassing behavior is all behind them. “Cheney has made herself a symbol of inter-Republican resistance to Trump’s post-election temper tantrum, to his fables about a stolen election, and to his role in provoking the Capitol riot — all of which is fair to call out, but all of which is now in the past.”
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/art...cheney-purge-riot-insurrection-democracy.html
Weird
Again, the same talking points I hear here from someone
Color me shocked
This doesnt even include the maricopa board unwilling to turn over routers.
Why? What are they hiding?
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/maricopa-county-routers-security-risk
"“By providing the routers, or even virtual images of routers, sensitive data and the lives of law enforcement personnel could be endangered,” he said, adding that the “routers remain in the county’s custody for the time being.”"
Why do republicans hate police?
Republican won't be happy until they know who voted against them and eliminate them .