January 6th insurrection thread...

Watching the libs defend the shooting of an unarmed woman is an amazing hypocrisy from them. Just imagine if the color of those involved were reversed.

Byrd is a screwup and a dangerous one at that.

"A 2004 incident where Byrd, who was off duty, fired his weapon at a stolen vehicle as it was fleeing his residential neighborhood"

[tw]1859589670360785270[/tw]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Garmel said:
Watching the libs defend the shooting of an unarmed woman is an amazing hypocrisy from them. Just imagine if the color of those involved were reversed.

Byrd is a screwup and a dangerous one at that.

"A 2004 incident where Byrd, who was off duty, fired his weapon at a stolen vehicle as it was fleeing his residential neighborhood"

[tw]1859589670360785270[/tw]
Click to expand...

There were people who applauded her shooting.
 
Everything will become known in time. 2020 election steal and fedsurrection on January 6th 2021.

Then when the world truly sees what the globalists have done we will run the western world for a 100 years.
 
The question will inevitably become - "What do you do with laws which were approved with the support of congressman that never actually won their elections?"
 
[tw]1878095934485078266[/tw]

Tick tock on the 2020 election steal deniers.

There will come a point where nobody will admit to thinking it was a legitimate election.
 
One thing I’ve found truly shocking is the right-wing attack on the individual officer that shot Ashli Babbit. There’s a good conversation to be had about use of force and prioritizing the lives of certain people over others, but that officer was in place to keep people out of that area to protect the lawmakers. That the same people who are concerned with prosecution of Chauvin are calling for this officer to be charged with murder is insane.
 
mqt said:
That the same people who are concerned with prosecution of Chauvin are calling for this officer to be charged with murder is insane.
Click to expand...

Chauvin was convicted on dubious evidence. The coroner changing his story in regards to what he told the prosecutor vs what he told the the court is damning. The fact that Floyd was at 3 times over the lethal limit of fentanyl is damning.

Meanwhile, Babbitt was shot while unarmed.
 
Garmel said:
Chauvin was convicted on dubious evidence. The coroner changing his story in regards to what he told the prosecutor vs what he told the the court is damning. The fact that Floyd was at 3 times over the lethal limit of fentanyl is damning.

Meanwhile, Babbitt was shot while unarmed.
Click to expand...

George Floyd died unarmed after Chauvin subdued him for several minutes despite Floyd being in no position to meaningfully harm anybody. Babbit was shot in a brief reaction to a mob trying to break down a door to a corridor the officer was guarding.
 
Garmel said:
Chauvin was convicted on dubious evidence. The coroner changing his story in regards to what he told the prosecutor vs what he told the the court is damning. The fact that Floyd was at 3 times over the lethal limit of fentanyl is damning.

Meanwhile, Babbitt was shot while unarmed.
Click to expand...

lol
 
Garmel said:
Chauvin was convicted ....

Meanwhile, Babbitt was shot while unarmed.
Click to expand...
Convicted by a jury of his peers as prescribed by law.

Facts some funnty stuff

Fact was, she was shot in the heat of the moment for blatently disobeying an officer of the law.
do we pictures and videos to recreate that moment ?
Naah I didnt think so.
Because the video of Sen Hawly running for safety tells you all about that "moment"
and like you say above, reality is tough for some

Do we have to relitigate EVERY ****ing historical incident,Every ****ing day ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
57Brave said:
Convicted by a jury of his peers as prescribed by law.

Facts some funnty stuff

Fact was, she was shot in the heat of the moment for blatently disobeying an officer of the law.
do we pictures and videos to recreate that moment ?
Naah I didnt think so.
Because the video of Sen Hawly running for safety tells you all about that "moment"
and like you say above, reality is tough for some

Do we have to relitigate EVERY ****ing historical incident,Every ****ing day ?
Click to expand...

lol

If an Antifa or BLM member gets shot while unarmed I'll tell you the reason was because they didn't obey the cop so they're fair game. I'm sure you'll be fine with that.

The woman was in a freaking window at the time.

The problem with you libs is that you're full of hypocrisy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I been around long enough to not just know but to expect when police instruct you to do something, and you don't ... you become fair game.

Whether I agree or disagree with that reality.

That is the problem with you pampered entitled white people. You dont think rules of the game apply to you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top