January 6th insurrection thread...

Tough to disagree with much of this very long twitter thread...


I think I've had discussions w/enough Boomer-tier Trump supporters who believe the 2020 election was fraudulent to extract a general theory about their perspective. It is also the perspective of most of the people at the Capitol on 1/6, and probably even Trump himself.

1/xMost believe some or all of the theories involving midnight ballots, voting machines, etc, but what you find when you talk to them is that, while they'll defend those positions w/info they got from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever, they're not particularly attached to them.

2/xHere are the facts - actual, confirmed facts - that shape their perspective: 1) The FBI/etc spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign. We now know that all involved knew it was fake from Day 1 (see: Brennan's July 2016 memo, etc).

3/xThese are Tea Party people. The types who give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in their bios. The intel community spying on a presidential campaign using fake evidence (incl forged documents) is a big deal to them.

4/xEveryone involved lied about their involvement as long as they could. We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence because of a court order. Comey denied on TV knowing the DNC paid for it, when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he knew.

5/xThis was true with everyone, from CIA Dir Brennan & Adam Schiff - who were on TV saying they'd seen clear evidence of collusion w/Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they hadn't - all the way down the line. In the end we learned that it was ALL fake.

6/xAt first, many Trump ppl were worried there must be some collusion, because every media & intel agency wouldn't make it up out of nothing. When it was clear that they had made it up, people expected a reckoning, and shed many illusions about their gov't when it didn't happen.

7/xWe know as fact: a) The Steele dossier was the sole evidence used to justify spying on the Trump campaign, b) The FBI knew the Steele dossier was a DNC op, c) Steele's source told the FBI the info was unserious, d) they did not inform the court of any of this and kept spying.

8/xTrump supporters know the collusion case front and back. They went from worrying the collusion must be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to realizing it was a scam, then watched as every institution - agencies, the press, Congress, academia - gaslit them for another year.

9/xWorse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the administration. They knew their entire lives would be investigated. Many quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees. The DoJ, press, & gov't destroyed lives and actively subverted an elected admin.

10/xThis is where people whose political identity was largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in Civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed all institutional boundaries. Because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite against an interloper.

11/xGOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of partisan binaries, but A LOT of Trump supporters see that the Regime is not partisan. They all know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it was a Tulsi Gabbard vs Jeb Bush election.

12/xIt's hard to describe to people on the left (who are used to thinking of gov't as a conspiracy... Watergate, COINTELPRO, WMD, etc) how shocking & disillusioning this was for people who encourage their sons to enlist in the Army, and hate ppl who don't stand for the Anthem.

13/xThey could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the corporate press is really what radicalized them. They hate journalists more than they hate any politician or gov't official, because they feel most betrayed by them.

14/xThe idea that the press is driven by ratings/sensationalism became untenable. If that were true, they'd be all over the Epstein story. The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime they now see in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period.

15/xThis is profoundly disorienting. Many of them don't know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know for absolute certain that the press, the FBI, etc would lie to them if there was. They have every reason to believe that, and it's probably true.

16/xThey watched the press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on nothing, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They led a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on a summer of riots.

17/xThey always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine, whatever. They still thought the press would admit truth if they were cornered. Now they don't. It's a different thing to watch them invent stories whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives and spark mass violence.

18/xTime Mag told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests, the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who framed them for political effect. In Ukraine we call that a color revolution.

19/xThroughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures. It wasn't just the mail-ins (they lowered signature matching standards, etc). After the collusion scam, the fake impeachment, Trump ppl expected shenanigans by now.

20/xRe: "fake impeachment", we now know that Trump's request for Ukraine to cooperate w/the DOJ regarding Biden's $ activities in Ukraine was in support of an active investigation being pursued by the FBI and Ukraine AG at the time, and so a completely legitimate request.

21/xThen you get the Hunter laptop scandal. Big Tech ran a full-on censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a political candidate. Period. Everyone knows it, all of the Tech companies now admit it was a "mistake" - but, ya know, the election's over, so who cares?

22/xGoes w/o saying, but: If the NY Times had Don Jr's laptop, full of pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, emails describing direct corruption and backed up by the CEO of the company they were using, the NYT wouldn't have been banned.

23/xThink back: Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its source. The NY Post was banned for reporting on true information.

24/xThe reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, "no fair!" That's how they felt about Romney's "binders of women" in 2012. This is different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the political process. 2

5/xAnd yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew.

26/xOver the ensuing weeks, they got shuffled around by grifters and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real.

27/xMedia & Tech did everything to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange - the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, the delays, etc - but rather than admit that and make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it (even in DMs!).

28/xEveryone knows that, just as Don Jr's laptop would've been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would've been Taken Very Seriously. See 2016 for proof.

29/xEven the courts' refusal of the case gets nowhere w/them, because of how the opposition embraced mass political violence. They'll say, w/good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he'll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house?

30/xIt's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were "protests", but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have families, too.

31/xForget the ballot conspiracies. It's a fact that governors used COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures (the Constitution states that only legislatures can do so) to help Biden to make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system.

32/xThey knew it was unconstitutional, it's right there in plain English. But they knew the cases wouldn't see court until after the election. And what judge will toss millions of ballots because a governor broke the rules? The threat of mass riots wasn't implied, it was direct.

33/xa) The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump from Day 1, b) The press is part of the operation, c) Election rules were changed, d) Big Tech censors opposition, e) Political violence is legitimized & encouraged, f) Trump is banned from social media.

34/xThey were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov't is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it. Trump fans should be happy he lost; it might've kept him alive. /end

(Source: https://threader.app/thread/1413165168956088321)
 
That’s why the charges of sedition are a joke. It’s been a coordinated hit job to nullfify 2016 the past five years. Screw them all. We are taking back our country.
 
That’s why the charges of sedition are a joke. It’s been a coordinated hit job to nullfify 2016 the past five years. Screw them all. We are taking back our country.

thethe, i have to say that unlike sturg your position is consistent

some deep enormous conspiracy including media, big pharma, deep state, silicon valley, social media grand boobahs have taken away our country

if you believe that (as you and the insurrectionists do) then the patriotic thing is to rise up against it

you are honest and consistent enough to say this: "Over time these will be seen as patriots trying to overthrow a tyrannical government that stopped allowing the people to decide."

sturg otoh wants to hem and haw and have it both ways...he wants to push the theory our country has been stolen from us by this vast conspiracy but he wants to avert his gaze from what people who agree with him did on January 6

these "brave patriots" rushed the Capitol so they could hang Pence and Pelosi and take the country back...they said this...they believe it even now

if you believe in this vast conspiracy you should be proud of what happened on January 6...in fact your only complaint would have to be about the half-assed way in which they invaded the Capitol...they didn't succeed in hanging Pence and Pelosi and stopping the counting of electoral votes...the mission was noble and patriotic but the execution was half-assed
 
Last edited:
Don’t worry zito. The receipts are coming.

Hahaha keep kicking that imaginary can down the road. They’ve been coming for how long now? I am curious, what other conspiracy theories do you believe in? JFK jr is still alive? Biden isn’t really the president and the potus is being currently played by an actor? What else you got for us?
 
thethe, i have to say that unlike sturg your position is consistent

some deep enormous conspiracy including media, big pharma, deep state, silicon valley, social media grand boobahs have taken away our country

if you believe that (as you and the insurrectionists do) then the patriotic thing is to rise up against it

you are honest and consistent enough to say this: "Over time these will be seen as patriots trying to overthrow a tyrannical government that stopped allowing the people to decide."

sturg otoh wants to hem and haw and have it both ways...he wants to push the theory our country has been stolen from us by this vast conspiracy but he wants to avert his gaze from what people who agree with him did on January 6

these "brave patriots" rushed the Capitol so they could hang Pence and Pelosi and take the country back...they said this...they believe it even now

if you believe in this vast conspiracy you should be proud of what happened on January 6...in fact your only complaint would have to be about the half-assed way in which they invaded the Capitol...they didn't succeed in hanging Pence and Pelosi and stopping the counting of electoral votes...the mission was noble and patriotic but the execution was half-assed

The thing you miss is that the goal was to pressure ELECTED republicans to leverage the last remaining constitutional lever to relook at the election. No democrats were the targets because they would never vote to do so.

Now we are going to be in a position where several states election results are wrong and no constitutional remedy to fix it. Ergo a constitutional crisis. We have illegitimate people serving in DC. That much will be made clear this year.

This completely ignores the coordinated hit job that was completely fake on the trump administration. The Russia hoax was fake. It was always fake. The FBI knew it was fake. The media in this country knew it was fake. It destroyed the presidency but it’s ok. All of this did was expedite the process to a new political order that will run the country for a century.

We will not be ruled by a global aristocracy. That is why we fought the American revolution and a big part of the civil war.
 
Last edited:
We will not be ruled by a global aristocracy. That is why we fought the American revolution and a big part of the civil war.

I think this too flows logically from the contents of post #1783.

You believe it. The people who stormed the Capitol on January 6 believed it. And if it is half true what they did that day was noble and patriotic.
 
I’m just interested in knowing what you don’t believe is true about that Twitter thread

i don't think a single one of the assertions is true or an accurate depiction of reality

it is a list of grievances that people like you and sturg believe

to each his own

but if you believe half of it, the folks on January 6 were doing their noble and patriotic duty
 
i don't think a single one of the assertions is true or an accurate depiction of reality

it is a list of grievances that people like you and sturg believe

to each his own

but if you believe half of it, the folks on January 6 were doing their noble and patriotic duty

Please give me one specific example.
 
The first factual assertion ignores the fact that the FBI opened its investigation based on a report they got from Australia on what Papadopoulos said at a bar to the Australian ambassador in London. Never drink with an Aussie. But Papadopoulos was too lacking in life experiences to know that.

Y'all free to believe your own set of alternate facts or realities. Just don't try to drag the rest of us there.
 
Last edited:
The first factual assertion ignores the fact that the FBI opened its investigation based on a report they got from Australia on what Papadopoulos said at a bar to the Australian ambassador in London. Never drink with an Aussie. But Papadopoulos was too lacking in life experiences to know that.

Now the whole case rests on this. Yikes.

No physical evidence of a hack on the DNC.

The whole thread is truth and it’s how many of us feel. The traditional republicans would just cower yo this nonsense. Is time to stand up. That’s what’s happening across the country. Very interested in that governors race in GA.
 
Now the whole case rests on this. Yikes.

No physical evidence of a hack on the DNC.

The whole thread is truth and it’s how many of us feel. The traditional republicans would just cower yo this nonsense. Is time to stand up. That’s what’s happening across the country. Very interested in that governors race in GA.

You asked for an example. And I looked at the very first factual assertion in the whole thread and found a whopper.
 
I think item #24 with its complaint of "Not fair!" is the perfect summary...booo hoo hoo...Not fair!

People who complain they are being disrespected go around behaving in a way that seems almost calculated to arouse disrespect. Among other things by joining a cult that worships a deranged narcissist. And then they complain when other people think they're crazy. How unfair!
 
Last edited:
I think item #24 with its complaint of "Not fair!" is the perfect summary...booo hoo hoo...Not fair!

People who complain they are being disrespected go around behaving in a way that seems almost calculated to arouse disrespect. Among other things by joining a cult that worships a deranged narcissist. And then they complain when other people think they're crazy. How unfair!

A feeling that can be easily corroborated with factual events from any time over the last ten years. You can pretend all the media lies and institutional American hatred is a fiction of the right all you want. It will not be tolerated anymore.
 
24/xThe reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, "no fair!" That's how they felt about Romney's "binders of women" in 2012. This is different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the political process. 2

5/xAnd yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew.

This is my favorite part of the whole screed. A group that claims to be excluded from the political process managed to increase its turnout by more than 13 million votes. Unfortunately, the other side turned out in even bigger numbers. Mature people who understand and respect democratic norms would not see some sort of dark conspiracy in this.
 
Back
Top