That's exactly right. And you know, absent the little insider spin we all get and that makes us feel like we've got a real window to what's going on, it's about as easy to take the same facts and reach way different conclusions.
I don't have any problem imagining that some of Frank's mannerisms were those of an asshole. It's a whole lot easier to put that narrative out there when the guy has been deposed.
I think that the alleged incompetence of the farm is overstated, I think he made some incredibly shrewd deals, and I think he did a hell of a job cleaning up the place after the last tenant smeared **** on the walls and took a dump in the middle of the living room. Schuerholz, the other end of the Shanks pitch/catch butt**** pipeline.
Frank won. He could have (probably would have) had burn it down meetings just like the Johns did.
Truthfully, where I think we got some spectacular contributions were from the scout we hired away from San Diego and the guy from New York who got us an unusually fruitful prospect return. getting the guys we got from SD, and getting Banuelos for trash from NY, those were nice deals. But hey, Frank found a lot of value, too. His problem was when he had a pocket full of money.
Yeah, I mean, how much crap are they supposed to take? For an alleged asshole, Frank has sure taken the high road on all this.
This. Frank even did an interview in the offseason and spoke not one ill word of the current regime who cast him out.
We are not following those organizations as closely. We do not not know who said what in the Braves organization. It could be a low level scout that has mouthed off to Bill or it could be JS himself. This idea that we have any clue who said what is ridiculous. All we know is that clearly someone within the Braves organization is giving Bill this information.
Apparently someone even like Keith Law can get this info though so Wren had to inspire some strong feelings against him. The scouting community is large and small at the same time. People talk and journalists will listen.
Which was my problem when he replaced JS initially.
Frank Wren being a jerk ect was the story in his time in baltimore too. Which was my problem when he replaced JS initially. There was that issue he had with Cal Ripken i think?
That's exactly right. And you know, absent the little insider spin we all get and that makes us feel like we've got a real window to what's going on, it's about as easy to take the same facts and reach way different conclusions.
I don't have any problem imagining that some of Frank's mannerisms were those of an asshole. It's a whole lot easier to put that narrative out there when the guy has been deposed.
I think that the alleged incompetence of the farm is overstated, I think he made some incredibly shrewd deals, and I think he did a hell of a job cleaning up the place after the last tenant smeared **** on the walls and took a dump in the middle of the living room. Schuerholz, the other end of the Shanks pitch/catch butt**** pipeline.
Frank won. He could have (probably would have) had burn it down meetings just like the Johns did.
Truthfully, where I think we got some spectacular contributions were from the scout we hired away from San Diego and the guy from New York who got us an unusually fruitful prospect return. getting the guys we got from SD, and getting Banuelos for trash from NY, those were nice deals. But hey, Frank found a lot of value, too. His problem was when he had a pocket full of money.
Yeah. Let's make everything about you, as has been the case since the beginning of time.
What?
Yeah, this.
I'm more than willing to give the current regime credit for what they do going forward. So far, there's a lot to like. The hires they made in the scouting department seem to have borne fruit already, and regardless of how one feels about the narrative of some of those folks being alienated by Wren, it's good to have them back.
That doesn't change the fact that JS flailed in his last couple of years running the club, and seemed bitter and outmoded as big chief. Liking the direction of the club =/= buying into the sanctimonious "Braves Way" circle jerk that happened last fall. So, I wish them the best going forward, but I'm not buying the zero-sum Wren-as-Satan narrative.
As for Shanks, his main bit when he had good sources in the org seemed to be breathlessly hyping prospects, then explaining to us which of them had makeup issues after they got dealt or failed. I wouldn't expect that to change. He's irrelevant, but I don't mind seeing him get called on his bull**** publicly, whoever is the source.
The know-it-all OP was Exhibit A against the paid Premium Content at Scout. It wasn't even worth chatting with him for free.
He wasn't fired for being a jerk. He was fired for one bad signing, and for leaving Cal Ripken behind for being late to a flight.
Leaving Cal Ripken behind was a great example of his jerkness. The fact that he was a jerk in ATl shouldnt suprise anybody.
The issue i see is how nobody cared about his jerkness when he first replaced JS. We care about it now.
Also im not the OP of this thread either.
Yeah, this.
I'm more than willing to give the current regime credit for what they do going forward. So far, there's a lot to like. The hires they made in the scouting department seem to have borne fruit already, and regardless of how one feels about the narrative of some of those folks being alienated by Wren, it's good to have them back.
That doesn't change the fact that JS flailed in his last couple of years running the club, and seemed bitter and outmoded as big chief. Liking the direction of the club =/= buying into the sanctimonious "Braves Way" circle jerk that happened last fall. So, I wish them the best going forward, but I'm not buying the zero-sum Wren-as-Satan narrative.
As for Shanks, his main bit when he had good sources in the org seemed to be breathlessly hyping prospects, then explaining to us which of them had makeup issues after they got dealt or failed. I wouldn't expect that to change. He's irrelevant, but I don't mind seeing him get called on his bull**** publicly, whoever is the source.