Late Night Talk Show Thread: (9/9/'15 Late Show w/ Stephen Colbert Begins)

weso1 said:
He's just preaching to liberal sheep though for the most part. They'll find another guy that liberal youth will slobber over.
Click to expand...

Meh, typical short-sighted view. He points out how retarded a majority of them are. It's ok that you don't like it, because it is embarrassing.
And no one on the right has that wit and intelligence (unfortunately).
 
yeezus said:
Meh, typical short-sighted view. He points out how retarded a majority of them are. It's ok that you don't like it, because it is embarrassing.
And no one on the right has that wit and intelligence (unfortunately).
Click to expand...

I'm sure you think your reply was cute, but it didn't really disagree with my point that it's mostly the liberal sheep that are watching it religiously, and in fact you seem to be a perfect example of the consistent Colbert Report watcher. And your own statement is truly the short sited one. While it's true that there are many more liberal comedians to choose from there are certainly just as many laughs to be had from liberal politicians. It's all sadly hilarious.
 
weso1 said:
I'm sure you think your reply was cute, but it didn't really disagree with my point that it's mostly the liberal sheep that are watching it religiously, and in fact you seem to be a perfect example of the consistent Colbert Report watcher. And your own statement is truly the short sited one. While it's true that there are many more liberal comedians to choose from there are certainly just as many laughs to be had from liberal politicians. It's all sadly hilarious.
Click to expand...

Well you don't have a point, because why would conservatives watch someone who so frequently points out their absurdity and stupidity? And he's a great showman and hilarious. He's wildly popular, and more popular than Stewart by far...there's a reason for that.
 
zitothebrave said:
Who replaces him on CC could be huge. I hope they get someone good. I'm not sure if any of the current correspondents can hold their own for half an hour.
Click to expand...

Very good point. Most of the talent on the network came up through the network as it developed. I didn't think John Oliver did particularly well (but wasn't flat out awful) subbing for John Stewart. Don't know if he's in line for anything or not.
 
50PoundHead said:
Very good point. Most of the talent on the network came up through the network as it developed. I didn't think John Oliver did particularly well (but wasn't flat out awful) subbing for John Stewart. Don't know if he's in line for anything or not.
Click to expand...

Yeah, not a huge Oliver fan. Hope they find someone else. Like you said, no terrible, but just isn't that guy. Filling Colbert's shoes will be near impossible.
 
Colbert will tone down and recreate himself for Late Nite, and be funnier than ever. And he's not as liberal as people make him out to be. He's a Catholic.
 
yeezus said:
Well you don't have a point, because why would conservatives watch someone who so frequently points out their absurdity and stupidity? And he's a great showman and hilarious. He's wildly popular, and more popular than Stewart by far...there's a reason for that.
Click to expand...

I just don't think you understand my point based on your posts. My initial reply was in regards to Sav stating that Colbert was a great tool to help counter the conservative message and now that he's gone it's a big loss because of that. I just stated that it doesn't really matter because most of the people watching are liberals anyway and their mind is already made up. That's my point.

You seem like one of the more closed minded liberals on this board and you are obviously a big Colbert fan. I think someone like you makes up their target audience.
 
Runnin said:
Colbert will tone down and recreate himself for Late Nite, and be funnier than ever. And he's not as liberal as people make him out to be. He's a Catholic.
Click to expand...

I agree with this. I think Colbert played his character and played to his audience well. He's not as liberal as his character was. I think he's more open minded than that and understands it's not hard to make fun of both sides.

I think late night is tough to predict though. I think it's anyone's guess whether he'll be good or not.
 
weso1 said:
I just don't think you understand my point based on your posts. My initial reply was in regards to Sav stating that Colbert was a great tool to help counter the conservative message and now that he's gone it's a big loss because of that. I just stated that it doesn't really matter because most of the people watching are liberals anyway and their mind is already made up. That's my point.

You seem like one of the more closed minded liberals on this board and you are obviously a big Colbert fan. I think someone like you makes up their target audience.
Click to expand...

And your point is inaccurate, because Colbert is widely the favorite and has far surpassed Stewart. So no, replacing him will not be easy or seamless because he is the absolute best at what he does. He's not blindly followed for his general views, but because he's really funny and really smart and great at playing his character. It will be a big loss because no one will be as funny.

I think "closed minded liberal" is a bit of an oxymoron, and that "closed minded" and "conservative" are synonymous, as they borderline pride themselves on being closed minded. It's part of their party. Unfortunately.
 
Runnin said:
Colbert will tone down and recreate himself for Late Nite, and be funnier than ever. And he's not as liberal as people make him out to be. He's a Catholic.
Click to expand...

This.

Colbert will be great. His interviews (Better Know a District) are my favorite. Granted, he won't be able to mock people like he does in those, but he'll find some balance and still make it funny.
 
[video=youtube;U7FTF4Oz4dI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7FTF4Oz4dI[/video]
 
Ferguson may not show it, but he's certainly upset that he was passed over.

How can you say Colbert can excel on the Late Show, and then say Ferguson couldn't? That's not a shot at Colbert by any means, I just think Ferguson wanted the chance to see what he could do at 11:30.

Ironic that Dave screwed a guy waiting to bump up to his slot in a way he got screwed over.
 
zitothebrave said:
Hardly comparable. Letterman and Conan got screwed in ways no one else can complain about.
Click to expand...

I think it was sort of implied a few years ago that Ferguson would at least get a chance to try 11:30. He's done the Late Late Show for 9 years now. Colbert is younger than him so he's not going to get a chance via age and next in line.
 
KeithLockhart said:
I think it was sort of implied a few years ago that Ferguson would at least get a chance to try 11:30. He's done the Late Late Show for 9 years now. Colbert is younger than him so he's not going to get a chance via age and next in line.
Click to expand...

Yeah, not comparable to Conan and Letterman where Conan signed a contract that basically kept him at NBC to take over late night, and Letterman was 11 and a half and replaced by someone with no real experience. Ferguson should have been consdiered and I'm sure he was but they chose Colbert. If they want to beat Fallon, you don't fight with Ferguson.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top