Legal/scotus thread
- Thread starter cajunrevenge
- Start date
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Brutal
sturg33
I
Not being a senile old man helps in the memory department
Yet, they believe everything coming out of the J6 committee regardless of the committee being untruthful several times and the selective video editing they have done.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I simply just apply your logic to it. There are no criminal charges then there is nothing incriminating on it. This is a good parallel to Trumps taxes except Hunter never agreed to release his laptop.
Last edited:
sturg33
I
What is it that you actually believe?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
The lack of self awareness is stunning. Are you describing the J6 comittee or the election fraud hoaxes?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Why do you need me to tell you, I come here to find out from the Stooges what I believe.
As for Hunter Biden, I believe he had a laptop. Everything beyond that I am skeptical of. If there actually is anything incriminating on there I will lead the charge for the head of whoever was responsible for not prosecuting him.
sturg33
I
And you have reviews the materials and don't think there is anything incriminating?
You mean the election fraud investigations we have ongoing in 3 states?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I dont access to his laptop. I trust if there is anything newsworthy it will be shouted from the rooftops by Republican propoganda media. You are welcome to link me to anything I missed. Just to be clear by incriminating we are talking about something he could be charged with a crime for. A picture of him smoking crack is not enough to charge a person for many reasons I will only go into if you really need it explained to you.
And just for the record Hunter Biden is in my top 10 of people I would celebrate if they actually went to prison. Joe Biden would be #2 on that list just above Jeff Sessions.
There were no hoaxes. The court said "no standing" on most of these cases. Not one went into the evidence stage. Can't call something a hoax if a judge doesn't want to see evidence.
When election officials go to court to keep people from looking under the hood you can bet something is wrong.
Last edited:
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
thank god the republican gave me a trigger warning before watching a master at his craft (although the red rocks one isn't his strongest stand up but it's still good)
i would have been devastated if i didn't get the warning about him using curse words
took longer than i thought for the seals (i prefer lemming personally but thought i would use a word a certain poster uses here to help him along) of the right to push that stand up bit though.
i would have been devastated if i didn't get the warning about him using curse words
took longer than i thought for the seals (i prefer lemming personally but thought i would use a word a certain poster uses here to help him along) of the right to push that stand up bit though.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
This was really well done.
