Legal/scotus thread

241092695_10159729684404122_2998380215721870568_n.jpg
 
The awful takes continue from the most awful people.

I'd add more to the budget for enforcement against men that father children and aren't present. Does that make you feel better?
 
thethe said:
The awful takes continue from the most awful people.

I'd add more to the budget for enforcement against men that father children and aren't present. Does that make you feel better?
Click to expand...

As alluded to earlier, this enforcement would disproportionately impact minorities, so you're a racist.
 
Maybe those that support abortion rights should consider their original intention and research Margaret Sanger.

Then marry that fact to the disproportionate amount of abortions done to African American women.
 
thethe said:
Maybe those that support abortion rights should consider their original intention and research Margaret Sanger.
Click to expand...


And then get back to me with the lame "pro life movement is based in Christian sexual morality" crap. They're supporting something based on racial holocaust and some of them dare call anyone else "literally Hitler."
 
Jaw said:
And then get back to me with the lame "pro life movement is based in Christian sexual morality" crap. They're supporting something based on racial holocaust and some of them dare call anyone else "literally Hitler."
Click to expand...

That dude is a clown.

If I could list one thing that America needs more than anything it would be more Christian morality.
 
thethe said:
Maybe those that support abortion rights should consider their original intention and research Margaret Sanger.

Then marry that fact to the disproportionate amount of abortions done to African American women.
Click to expand...

Wait till you find out about the people who founded this country

This is some of the weakest **** ever to keep going back to lol

But on brand for ya
 
Man, there’s something weird about this picture from these Texas losers

Just can’t get my finder on it though

[tw] 1433756084691427329[/tw]
 
57Brave said:
241092695_10159729684404122_2998380215721870568_n.jpg
Click to expand...

What a terrible take. Classic example of assuming that a fetus has no independent rights and jumping straight to regulating a woman's body.

If a fetus has the rights of personhood then outlawing its destruction is perfectly reasonable. If it doesn't then such regulations are oppressive to women.

You cant prove if a fetus has rights or not so people assume they're right on that and jump to more inflammatory rhetoric.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top