Legal/scotus thread

Justice Clarence Thomas should be subpoenaed for how much he knew about his wife's treasonous activities. And he should definitely not be involved in any court decision where his wife is a possible co-conspirator.
 
FzUG5AsaUAM5yl0
 
Or a guy who has never gotten more votes than his general election opponent. He gets more representation on the court than two term presidents who actually represented a majority of voters.
 
TheIntellectualist posted an update

2 hours ago
CNN reports Justice Alito’s Rome trip, following his decision

overturning Roe v. Wade, was funded by Notre Dame’s

Religious Liberty Initiative – a group that supported

the Roe overturn.
 
The document that needed an amendment to say you can't enslave people and that women could vote? Thenproblem with the constitution is people decide what they want it yo say then work backwards to try to justify it.
 
And little thethe loses yet again. This "independent legislature theory" was what they pinned their hopes on. Down in flames it goes. Trump didnt even get a majority of the justices he appointed.
 
[tw]1674418994110160898[/tw]

Universities should and will continue to favor applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds. But I'm glad they won't be able to use race and ethnicity as a sort of short-hand for that.

The real scandal in university admissions is the legacy points that so many schools award to children of alumni and other well-connected people. Legal but still scandalous.
 
seeing the left's meltdown that they can no longer be overtly racist at the academic institutions anymore has been a fun experience.

meanwhile, I appreciated Thomas' takedown of the affirmative action hired SC justice

FzzLbTkX0AIhwC5

FzzLbTgXgAAsjsD
 
Biden: "Many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualified students. This is not how college admissions work."

At Harvard, black students in the 40th percentile of their academic index had a greater chance of getting in than Asian students in the 100th percentile.
 
nsacpi said:
This is probably the most important case to be decided this term. It concerns whether state legislatures are subject to judicial review when making elections law.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1271_3f14.pdf
Click to expand...

I agree with the court's decision. The state legislatures are in control of the elections via what the Constitution says but there isn't anything in there that says that there can't be any judicial oversight.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top