Let's Talk About Media

You tell me, the accusation was that I only post Fox News. I said go find a bunch of it. If you think I do it should be easy to find at least 5 or 10.

I’ll wait.

OR- and you may wanna just consider this- you are full of **** and got caught posting horse crap again and could just admit it
 
Tapate50 said:
You tell me, the accusation was that I only post Fox News. I said go find a bunch of it. If you think I do it should be easy to find at least 5 or 10.

I’ll wait.

OR- and you may wanna just consider this- you are full of **** and got caught posting horse crap again and could just admit it
Click to expand...

It is rare for you to post something that is news.

And even more rare for you to mention a source.

But when you do mention a source it is usually a gem. Last time you did it was as follows: "Was listening to RFK Jr the other day..."

Links and sources can be a good thang. But I can see why some shy away from sharing their sources when they post news.
 
Last edited:
On the rare occasions you post something that might be news it is along the lines of: UN Pushing to legalize consensual sex with minors.

No source. No context. Just some weird **** like that.
 
Last edited:
Eh. You might want to note the word recent in the section that is bolded. It is still more likely than not that the official overall count (since the start of covid) significantly understates deaths due to covid in this country and understates it by even more around the world.

Nice try. And I do appreciate you sharing a source.

Around the world excess deaths were 15 million the first 2 years of covid. Quite a bit higher than the official number attributed to covid of 6 million. More recently, the gap has probably closed or even been eliminated. An interesting development that hardly justifies the claim by Doctor Bass that there has been some sort of conspiracy to "overhype" covid. 15 million excess deaths don't require hyping let alone overhyping.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
It is rare for you to post something that is news.

And even more rare for you to mention a source.

But when you do mention a source it is usually a gem. Last time you did it was as follows: "Was listening to RFK Jr the other day..."

Links and sources can be a good thang. But I can see why some shy away from sharing their sources when they post news.
Click to expand...

I don't really consume news other than what can pop up or come across my eyeballs casually. Not fox, not cnn, not anything other than google suggestions (and that indeed is rare)

I'm the same way when thethe says the media has told me how to think about Trump and Desantis. No one is telling me anything.

Why would I post about depressing **** all day long? Most of the time I can just wait on you to post about it, and then read your reply (not answer) about why you weren't wrong about it.

If I thought for a second you would listen to a podcast, I'd post it for reference.

Would you?
 
Last edited:
Tapate50 said:
You tell me, the accusation was that I only post Fox News. I said go find a bunch of it. If you think I do it should be easy to find at least 5 or 10.

I’ll wait.

OR- and you may wanna just consider this- you are full of **** and got caught posting horse crap again and could just admit it
Click to expand...


Wrong. I accused you and the other Stooges of taking issue with any news source that has any bad news for Trump. I have asked repeatedly for news sources you won't **** on and never get an answer because the only news you find valid is the ones that tell you what you want to hear and I can't abide by those standards.
 
I have answered that. Repeatedly. You just don’t like the answer. WaPo is in there too. But you can’t say I didn’t earn you BI was trash.

Now go find where I post Fox News.

You won’t find it much.

My last link was CNN admitting voting machines were compromised.

Hey man- you might be losing touch. May be time for a break. Especially if you think I’ve got a media bias because of what they say about a former President lol

Unfortunately not everyone views the world through a Trump lens, but tell us don’t again !
 
Last edited:
Can you link me to the list of media you approve of that you claim to have already posted.



You posting a link from CNN when it fits the narrative you want and ****ting on them when it's news you don't like is exactly what I am accusing you and the Stooges of. What you do is try to disparage media as biased against Trump then when they post something that you think is good for Trump you say even the leftwing biased media posted this. I don't and won't play that game with you.








The only mention of Fox by me was to include it in the list of ones you and the Stooges don't approve of despite its literal purpose is to help Republicans get elected.
 
What game?

Dems facts

Sorry you have fallen off the deep end.

I said WaPo and BI over and over should be completely ignored and you posted anyway. You got burned, admit it

Stop looking through the lens of Trump on everything , it’s really sad
 
BOROWITZ: Biden Invites Matt Gaetz to White House to Pet His Dog
F7FQTH_a4AAiQaU
 
Palmer Report
@PalmerReport
·
15h
Remember, a shutdown was ALWAYS unlikely. There were simply never the

votes for a shutdown. And when one side doesn’t have the votes,

the other side wins. Everyone in the media knows this.

So what was all that bull**** media hype the past month about an

“inevitable” shutdown?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top