Let's Talk About Media

I'd be curious to know if that screenshot was actually representative of the amount of time to CNN spent covering the terrorist attack.

In a broader sense, though, a media-stoked national freakout over an incident like that does more to advance the interests of the terrorist than it does the American public.

logic

how does it work?
 
Natasha Bertrand‏Verified account @NatashaBertrand
9h9 hours ago

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries now asking who authorized the DOJ to invite reporters to come view private texts between 2 DOJ employees who were subject of pending investigation. Also asked how it's possible that Fox News has 10k Strzok-Page texts when DOJ only gave Congress 375 texts
.
285 replies 4,483 retweets 7,451 likes
 
I am shocked you are more outraged at the leak than the damming evidence. It's like we have see you take this stance before.
 
y'all truly are pathetic

and before the so called freedom lover chimes in with his non related remark

**** the iranian regime

So irrelevant. No way do our remarks despair age what the Iranian people are trying to accomplish. The media in this country is bankrupt.
 
[TW]947325315126198274[/TW]

Or, I suppose one might formulate it:

Actual bravery is protesting the regime in Iran, not phony campus free-speech posturing.

You'd have to work to find a lamer and less substantive thing to say about a genuinely consequential subject.
 
Or, I suppose one might formulate it:

Actual bravery is protesting the regime in Iran, not phony campus free-speech posturing.

You'd have to work to find a lamer and less substantive thing to say about a genuinely consequential subject.

The commentary is about the lack of coverage from media, which the dumb women's protest did not suffer from

But you knew that
 
[tw]935153851807694848[/tw]

Written 11/27/17

TJS at its worst. This man should be embarrassed and strongly consider his ethical obligations the comes with his profession.
 
The commentary is about the lack of coverage from media, which the dumb women's protest did not suffer from

But you knew that

Actually, that's not at all clear from context. Further, it's not even an accurate take. There is no lack of media coverage of the current protests. Trying to somehow suggest that there would be parity between the coverage of the two is just silly.
 
Actually, that's not at all clear from context. Further, it's not even an accurate take. There is no lack of media coverage of the current protests. Trying to somehow suggest that there would be parity between the coverage of the two is just silly.

The reporting on most MSM networks was non-existent until the second day after it was clear it was escalating fast on twitter. Someone as momentous as a peoples uprising in Iran should be reported on instantaneously. This is actual news. Not white trucks in front of a golf course.
 
The reporting on most MSM networks was non-existent until the second day after it was clear it was escalating fast on twitter. Someone as momentous as a peoples uprising in Iran should be reported on instantaneously. This is actual news. Not white trucks in front of a golf course.

What's your basis for saying this? Could you be more specific, so I can at least understand who and when we're talking about?
 
What's your basis for saying this? Could you be more specific, so I can at least understand who and when we're talking about?

The protests have been going on for almost 4 days now. Most msm went reporting on it till halfway though and some outlets like CNN pushed the Iranian government propoganda as to the nature of the protest's. I mean seriously Julio. We should all be able to a free that a free Iran is best for the world. In no way should there be puff pieces on pro grovernment rallies.
 
hold up, the president that has banned iranians and the followers who are scared of them

and the ones that think you should bend your knee and we need "authority back"

are on the side of protesters now?

****ing garbage
 
Back
Top