You should go to a different country then. Founders never wanted the federal government to be this powerful.
I'm not sure what this has to do with the Founders or my status as an American. The filibuster for minority blockage was never part of their vision and actually something they were against. The EC also looks starkly different today than it did at our founding. To quote the Donald himself in 2012 "The Electoral College is a disaster for Democracy."
Why the desperation to cling to a vision from Founders who existed in a world without planes, cars, internet, weapons, population, etc. that we have today? Can you imagine a business that decides to never change because of the initial vision their CEO laid out? Or a sports team that decides to never adapt because the original team played a certain way? They would be roundly (and rightfully so) criticized before eventually failing. An initial plan is really important, but adaptation is a must.
Let me know which of the following statements you disagree with because to me they seem like something everyone would want:
1) American government would be more effective if the party in control of the Senate were able to pass legislation in the normal course of order, not solely through reconciliation.
2) Senate majorities on both sides have seen productivity dwindle over the past fifteen years as cloture motions have more than doubled.
3) The 6,000,000 Trump voters in California should have their vote count just as much as the 193,000 Trump voters in Wyoming.
4) The 5,200,000 Biden voters in Texas should have their vote count just as much as the 242,000 Biden voters in Vermont.
5) Presidential candidates from both parties should campaign in places like Birmingham, Chicago, DC, and Charleston, WV because every voter matters- not just in places like Raleigh, Orlando, Milwaukee, and Pittsburgh because those are the only states contested.
