cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I cant keep track. Is it Bidens fault or was he brain dead?
That is ridiculous logic worthy of only scorn and humiliation. Lets keep using this logic then. If there was any evidence any prominent Democrat did anything wrong with Epstein Trump would have used it during his first term. If any prominent Republicans were implicated you can bet Trump would have used it as leverage against them so the only ones we can be certain are not on the list are the ones who have feuded with Trump.If Trump was implicated in the Epstein scandal in any real way, it would’ve been used against him prior to the election.
I'm just making a point that there are policies that exist for good reasons that preclude sharing information with the public during an active investigation. Not making any comment about whether this or the prior administration was doing a good job adhering to those policies. But I think your point is well taken!Would you like to review the number of policies the Trump regime has broken in only half a year in office? Its a long list. You really think Trump would let any agencies policy would stop him from releasing dirt on his political enemies?
What you’re saying and what I’m saying aren’t actually incompatible. I don’t disagree Trump would’ve looked to damage a prominent (D) if he really had the goods. My best guess is there’s no there there, while remaining open to the possibility that the files are so damaging to prominent people on both sides of the aisle that we’re in a nuclear deterrence type situation .That is ridiculous logic worthy of only scorn and humiliation. Lets keep using this logic then. If there was any evidence any prominent Democrat did anything wrong with Epstein Trump would have used it during his first term. If any prominent Republicans were implicated you can bet Trump would have used it as leverage against them so the only ones we can be certain are not on the list are the ones who have feuded with Trump.
There are also wealthy powerful people who contribute a lot of money to both sides. Insurance of a sort.What you’re saying and what I’m saying aren’t actually incompatible. I don’t disagree Trump would’ve looked to damage a prominent (D) if he really had the goods. My best guess is there’s no there there, while remaining open to the possibility that the files are so damaging to prominent people on both sides of the aisle that we’re in a nuclear deterrence type situation .
ouch to his loyalists
![]()