Lolita Express is finally arrested.

Not sure how this quote is a big deal at all but willing to understand your interpretation.

Your willingness to turn a blind eye toward this is really scummy. It might be irrelevant if weren't already a mountain of history proving Trump is a womanizer.

That's not saying I believe Trump is a child predator or that I believe he knew what was going on, but there is enough of a history with him to not completely disregard that quote.
 
Last edited:
Your willingness to turn a blind eye toward this is really scummy. It might be irrelevant if weren't already a mountain of history proving Trump is a womanizer.

That's not saying I believe Trump is a child predator or that I believe he knew what was going on, but there is enough of a history with him to not completely disregard that quote.

In this vein, I understand why, but find it reprehensible, that events like this automatically devolve into another arrow in the partisan warfare quiver. I think Trump's--and Clinton's (and probably half of Capitol Hill's)--attitude towards women can be summed up by his statements/actions. That doesn't make him a child molester or part of any kind of sex trafficking ring. But the horrific nature of the crimes for which Epstein is being charged becomes clouded by both sides' eagerness to score political points.
 
Your willingness to turn a blind eye toward this is really scummy. It might be irrelevant if weren't already a mountain of history proving Trump is a womanizer.

That's not saying I believe Trump is a child predator or that I believe he knew what was going on, but there is enough of a history with him to not completely disregard that quote.

Who is turning a blind eye?

Can you present real evidence that might implicate someone (like taking trips to orgy island) before tarnishing their name?
 
Let's get the facts straight. Trump has already said he was never a big fan of Epstein. Doesn't get more direct than that. You can't be doing predatoresque things with someone you weren't a big fan of.
 
Who is turning a blind eye?

Can you present real evidence that might implicate someone (like taking trips to orgy island) before tarnishing their name?

I'm not tarnishing anyone's name and have not accused Trump of anything. But quotes like that combined with his history are not something to completely disregard, as you are. Especially in a situation of this magnitude.
 
There are many people with questions to answer.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/...tion=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage

The arrest of Jeffrey E. Epstein on federal sex-trafficking charges has focused attention on the lenient plea bargain that state and federal prosecutors reached with him in Florida over similar charges more than a decade ago.

But the new indictment has also unexpectedly renewed scrutiny of another prosecutor’s treatment of Mr. Epstein: the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr.

During a hearing in 2011, a seasoned sex-crimes prosecutor from Mr. Vance’s office argued forcefully in court that Mr. Epstein, who had been convicted in Florida of soliciting an underage prostitute, should not be registered as a top-level sex offender in New York.

Instead, the prosecutor, Jennifer Gaffney, asked a judge to reduce Mr. Epstein’s sex-offender status to the lowest possible classification, which would have limited the personal information available to the public, and would have kept him from being listed on a registry of sex offenders for life.

Justice Ruth Pickholz vehemently denied the request and expressed incredulity that the district attorney’s office would argue in support of a man accused of sexually molesting dozens of teenage girls in Florida.

“I have to tell you, I’m a little overwhelmed because I have never seen a prosecutor’s office do anything like this,” the judge told Ms. Gaffney.

Mr. Vance has said the request was a mistake and had been made by Ms. Gaffney without his knowledge.

Still, his office’s decision to take Mr. Epstein’s side in the hearing drew renewed criticism this week, as federal prosecutors in Manhattan brought new charges against Mr. Epstein, a wealthy financier whose social circle has included President Trump and former President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Epstein’s lawyers, Mr. Lefkowitz and Sandra Musumeci, also argued for the lower rating. They noted their client had been rated a level-one sex offender in the United States Virgin Islands, his legal residence, and had received a similar rating in Florida.

Five months before the hearing, the lawyers had supplied Manhattan prosecutors with a deposition in which the lead prosecutor in Palm Beach, Lanna Belohlavek, told detectives “there are no real victims here,” Ms. Musumeci said in court.

Justice Pickholz was unmoved and labeled Mr. Epstein a level-three sex offender, which meant his name and address would be on a state registry of sex offenders for life. His lawyers appealed the decision, but an appellate panel upheld the ruling.

During the appeal, the Manhattan district attorney’s office did an about-face, admitting Ms. Gaffney had misinterpreted the law and stating there was “no basis for a downward departure” from the highest rating.
 
Last edited:
Again, how is this your response? Its like talking to an animal.

you are

i am a homosapien

the response is still to you coming out of no where talking about wikipedia though and me laughing at it though
 
Or, equally, that he didn’t tell the transition team about it, the source is lying, but he doesn’t want to say they’re lying because he wants to keep his job.
 

How you can't see the propaganda oozing out if this piece is beyond me.. It's trying soo hard to connect Trump. Desperately. Hopefully when it becomes apparant this can't be used to take down the President it won't be buried again.

The word "Trump" appears more often than "Epstein" 32 to 29 lolol. Rofl Vanity ****ing Fair. I love the shots they take at Enquirer, like they're any better.
 
Last edited:
I think there’s a decent chance that he really did tell the transition team this, and that it’s bull****.

There is going to be an investigation, probably several investigations, of the plea deal Acosta gave Epstein. My guess is Acosta will be long gone from his current job by the time the results are out.
 
How you can't see the propaganda oozing out if this piece is beyond me.. It's trying soo hard to connect Trump. Desperately. Hopefully when it becomes apparant this can't be used to take down the President it won't be buried again.

The word "Trump" appears more often than "Epstein" 32 to 29 lolol. Rofl Vanity ****ing Fair. I love the shots they take at Enquirer, like they're any better.

Actually it shows up 30 times as a FYI, and 2 of them were place/organization names.

Anyway, comparing Vanity Fair to national Enquirer is moronic. That was what I came here to do.
 
It's a story when a president or a former president is an associate of a criminal like Epstein. Their relationship to Epstein should be covered.
 
There is going to be an investigation, probably several investigations, of the plea deal Acosta gave Epstein. My guess is Acosta will be long gone from his current job by the time the results are out.

Predictably, he was lying through his teeth about the plea deal.
 
Back
Top