I am in favor of that deal if he will sign for that.
I dont see Adames getting 30 per.
I dont see Adames getting 30 per.
I mean he's like the only legit SS on the market. I dont think he'd get 6/180 but it's not totally out of the realm of possibility after the season he just had. I dont know if AA would hand out that kind of deal. But he was deep in on Nola last year so who knows.
6 years 150 million seems like a very conservative price for him. Probably will be the starting price to just get into the bidding war. We dont really know if the player will prioritize Average yearly value or length of contract. I could see someone going as high as 8 years 200 million on a lengthy deal or even 6 years 180 million. I think he is just a landmine of a free agent someone is going to step on. I would still be all kinds of excited if we signed him simply because he is atleast a good bet to perform for 1-2 years before going Melvin on his new team. Imagine if we signed this dude and he played like Arcia in the first half. And I dont mean Arcia when he is almost an average hitter, I mean slumping Arcia.
Let's switch gears and assume the bidding for Adames gets crazy and AA doesn't win. So we get to see Arcia at SS for $2M. Not awesome, but sometimes going cheap is the correct play.
Let's also assume AA then decides to focus on LF by trading Soler, letting Laureano walk, and slotting Kelenic as the 4th OFer with White as the 5th OFer.
What are the realistic LF options?
I for one would rather keep Soler than go with the alternatives in LF. Hernandez is the best option on the FA market outside of Soto (not happening) and Hernandez hasn't been much better of a defender than Soler. So it seems silly to trade Soler and sign basically the same guy for more money.
Bichette isn't a terrible option either, but his defense has been rather suspect in the past.