Of all the dumb places the gun debate goes, this might be the dumbest.
What weapons can an individual possess that will protect him from "tyranny"? Should an individual be allowed to own weapons that could legitimately protect him from the government? What does that look like, I wonder? What does "tyranny" look like, for that matter? Some people would argue that we're already there, so does that mean that we should be able to pop shots at the cops and the feds when we think we're being oppressed? I need someone to game this one out for me.