The government's making "cancer screenings, check-ups, pre-natal care, nutritutional services, and STD testing" more readily available is hardly "forcing morals on everyone else". But nice strawman.
It is when you force everyone to pay for it.
The government's making "cancer screenings, check-ups, pre-natal care, nutritutional services, and STD testing" more readily available is hardly "forcing morals on everyone else". But nice strawman.
It is when you force everyone to pay for it.
The government's making "cancer screenings, check-ups, pre-natal care, nutritutional services, and STD testing" more readily available is hardly "forcing morals on everyone else". But nice strawman.
not really
but if the morals you are arguing against are being against helping people
who gives a **** what that personals morals are? it would be similar to being lectured about womens rights from the gov't of saudi arabia
By that logic we should have the government pay for nothing.
What baffles me is that you say that but certainly promote the government killing people overseas with drones.
Who determines what is helping people? King goldfly?
are you trying to argue that cancer screenings and pre natal care etc isn't helping people?
I mean, at least that's consistent I guess. I assume what his comment was then based around the erroneous logic in not funding abortion directly meaning it's not indirectly funding it, but that kind of ****ty logic is not confined to the left, but rather all posters of political memes.
Yes, my point is that cancer screenings and pre natal care etc isn't helping people.
What are you willing to force someone to pay for or put them in jail if they do not?
A number of things.
Though I do appreciate the troll job weso.
What did we do for 200 years before government got involved?
died really earlier in life from preventable things
yes, the gov't hasn't helped fund any of that
oh i'm sorry, stole by gun point to help with that
died really earlier in life from preventable things