Meme & Quote Thread

Runnin said:
29572662_1908836445794398_2217363749942578586_n.jpg
Click to expand...

The irony that you posted this is hilarious
 
Remember kids, a president who added more debt than the previous 43 presidents combined, was actually a fiscal budgetary steward

I'd love to live in the left's fantasy land
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
sturg33 said:
Remember kids, a president who added more debt than the previous 43 presidents combined, was actually a fiscal budgetary steward

I'd love to live in the left's fantasy land
Click to expand...

this explanation from the above Forbes article

Republicans use a sound bite that the federal debt doubled under Obama. In looking at the numbers that is close to being numerically correct but falls short of being 100%. However when you take into account the Great Recession, making W. Bush’s temporary tax cuts permanent, increased Social Security and Medicare spending as more Baby Boomers retire and become 65 years old and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars he inherited the story is quite different.

...

Using percentages is a better way of analyzing data in a lot of cases as it compensates when the data set numbers are larger or smaller from each other. Federal debt falls into this category as it increases over time. The compounding impact of growth can make using absolute numbers meaningless.
 
57Brave said:
this explanation from the above Forbes article

Republicans use a sound bite that the federal debt doubled under Obama. In looking at the numbers that is close to being numerically correct but falls short of being 100%. However when you take into account the Great Recession, making W. Bush’s temporary tax cuts permanent, increased Social Security and Medicare spending as more Baby Boomers retire and become 65 years old and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars he inherited the story is quite different.

...

Using percentages is a better way of analyzing data in a lot of cases as it compensates when the data set numbers are larger or smaller from each other. Federal debt falls into this category as it increases over time. The compounding impact of growth can make using absolute numbers meaningless.
Click to expand...

I can assure you I understand how percentages work, as I also certain that you don't based on numerous conversations.

Do you want me to show you, using data, how Obama ballooned our debt?

By the way, how's that education crippling evidence coming along
 
your assurances are hollow. You argued in Jan 2017 Trump spurred the economy then later, before they even went into effect, the tax breaks were a boon to the economy. Spare me

sure . But I assure you, my think tank can beat up your think tank

Why bother ?
what ever you are told you summarily dismiss without consideration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top