Agreed.
MINORS THREAD TUESDAY 5/16: Harrington Seeks 5th Win
- Thread starter rico43
- Start date
Agreed.
bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
me too, but I am not personally seeing anything negative about him learning at the highest level either. The biggest argument is the clock and once they lock him up to a multi year contract at a team friendly rate, that will be gone too. The FO had their reason to call him up. regardless of what internet GM's say, they measured the pros and cons carefully and made a decision based on that. They are not stupid because of it.
Folks focusing on Swanson "not being ready" are missing the point with respect to calling him up being a bad idea. Whether or not he was "ready" has nothing to do with it being the wrong decision. Frankly, there doesn't need to be any reason other than the fact it was stupid to call up a potential franchise cornerstone to a non-contending team and losing control over his age 29 season. Hopefully we don't see them make the same mistake with Albies...and then Acuna.
And don't look now, but over the last 2 weeks Swanson's line has been .294/.405/.412 (.817 OPS). I think the kid will be just fine...and the Braves will be regretting losing control of that age 29 season.
bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
I agree.. but I still think the Braves know they are going to sign him long term and that will not play a factor. I understand control and cost savings. I am saying they are only concerned with Swanson learning at the highest level and inking him to a LONGGGG contract within the next few years. Not 5-10 million it might cost them.
Agreed. Calling a potential cornerstone player to the MLB level has to be predicated on
1. The guy is doing well (not "ok") in the upper minors (aka "he is ready"), and
2. An every day MLB role appears either through poor performance, injury, or trade, and one of
3a. The prospect is at an age he is already controlled through his 20s, or
3b. The team is projected to be a solid playoff contender and needs all the win it can get
The Swanson promotion failed to satisfy points 1, and 3a/b, and was a complete bonehead move by the good ol' boys club in Atlanta.
Then in 2023 when the Braves are trying to compete with the newly resurgent Phillies who have tons more money than the Braves, we will see how much the Braves wish they had that extra $10M to upgrade the roster. When the Braves fail to sign that platoon-mate for some position, or fail to land the 2 WAR pitcher to plug a hole in the rotation, or fail to sign that elite LOOGY to shut down Ryan Howard v2.0, we can all point back to the Swanson promotion as the reason why.
And I'm sure the posi-Braves will still defend it even then.
Southcack77
Well-known member
I've always doubt that Swanson is a "franchise cornerstone."
I saw little reason to call up someone that was struggling at AA.
I saw little reason to do that when it started his clock.
I think if he's an above average talent, he'll probably be able to figure things out at the MLB level. And if he has to do that from the 8 slot, that's not big deal either. That's how a lot of guys start and I mostly don't believe in the idea that you permanently stunt a player by his going through a little adversity.
I haven't really changed my view of his upside. HE could still be an above average SS. He could still be marginal. I'm not really sure about all the hype and I'm not really sure about the doom and gloom based on a month.
At the end of the day though, I don't think contract and control should be the only guiding light for an organization. But it should be a factor and I think you've identified some other factors in your posts that are correct.
If Swanson had been dominating AA maybe it would have made some sense. I'd have given him the same cup of coffee Ruiz got, I think, if I'd been making the decisions.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
no they didnt...JC said the thought didn't cross his mind until one day Hart suggested it out of the blue...the decision was bad and the decision making process even worse