NBA Thread

Oh great, the Harden debate again, it was a horrible trade and that is that.

Injuries have hurt them the last 2 years, no way around it.

But Harden wouldnt be close to the player he is now if he was on OKC.
 
gilesfan said:
How well was Wade walking when they won it all a couple years ago?

Making excuses for not winning because your 3rd best player was injured (but still played insane minutes) is just whining.
Click to expand...

Wade averaged around 19-20 PPG in the Finals when they won it all, do you just like getting owned all the time?
 
Heyward said:
Wade averaged around 19-20 PPG in the Finals when they won it all, do you just like getting owned all the time?
Click to expand...

You do realize that Wade was terrible in the playoffs, one of his worst, while Ibaka played pretty much his career averages, right? Right
 
gilesfan said:
You do realize that Wade was terrible in the playoffs, one of his worst, while Ibaka played pretty much his career averages, right? Right
Click to expand...

Yes, because Ibaka was healthy.

You're right about Wade, but they didnt really need him until Indy/SA.
 
Rockets up 1 without Harden early in Atl.

But chop, giles and others say the roster is a bunch of scrubs with Harden?
 
This is the most lulz post of all time. Just for record its halfway thru first Quarter.
 
Hard to put Harden in the MVP race if they win without him, thats what people say about Curry.
 
That was a joke but they're kicking the **** out of Atl without him.

The roster is loaded, and hardly **** without him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top