.....
Semantics...you know what he meant.
.....
I disagree with the idea behind the bolded. The fact that we can't extend the entire core is exactly why managing their service time becomes so crucial. If Swanson is what we think he can be, I'd want to maximize the amount of prime years we get from him since extending him would be crazy expensive in that scenario. I don't mind letting a couple of the pitchers get their lumps this year, but the top-end talent like Swanson and Albies I want nowhere near Atlanta this year.
IF - and it's obviously a big if - you believe in some of these kids, you begin discussions with them BEFORE you ever get to the point that the finances become an issue. I mentioned offering Swanson the same type of money the Rays offered Longoria before he was promoted a while back. Is it a gamble? Of course. The thing is, you have to trust your evaluators/Coaches/scouts at some point if you're JS/Hart/Coppy etc., and put your neck on the line - otherwise you've hired the wrong people to begin with and you're never going to be successful anyway. Then his service-time clock never becomes an issue AND the exploding salaries that are going to continue never become a concern.
I've yet to hear the first person that doesn't think Swanson's going to be successful at whatever point he's promoted. If you can't save some money by offering him something that COULD become a team-friendly contract in the long-run before he's ever making money, you've got no shot at extending him at anything less than market value in the future. I know it drives lots of people crazy around here, but they trusted those people when they chose to extend Freddie for a "decent" figure and wouldn't entertain paying Heyward anything close to market value. Anyone who still wants to argue that decision is nuts. $50 million more for a guy who's great defensively, hurt constantly, hits less than .230, and can't hit the ball over the fence? No thanks - and I couldn't care less if he caught every ball hit in the air right of the LF power alley.
Nick Swisher is thrilled the Braves released him
Tim Casey of Vice Sports spoke with Nick Swisher, who is currently at Triple-A Scranton-Wilkes Barre in the Yankees organization, waiting for his shot. It’s been a rough couple of years for Swisher in which he’s suffered through knee injuries, ineffectiveness and anger from Indians fans for not living up to the contract the club gave him.
He was shuffled off to Atlanta last year, played poorly and did not make the team out of spring training this year. But he’s still happy that the Braves, the worst baseball team in over a decade and serious contenders to be the worst baseball team in the modern era, thought that he wasn’t good enough:
Guy is stuck in Scranton and, at best, has the chance to be a bench bat for a last place Yankees team and he’s still happy he’s not in Atlanta. Man, what a year.
http://mlb.nbcsports.com/2016/05/12...aves-released-him/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
Since 2012 Freeman has played in all of 9 games more than Heyward. So the constantly hurt BS needs to stop. His main two reasons for missing games in his MLB career is getting hit in the face and having an appendectomy. Heyward is not injury prone. Freeman is the much larger risk with his wrist and eyes issue. Things that can come back to haunt him at some point. He's also hit 270 in that time frame while Freeman has hit 286. And Freeman has averaged 24 homers per 162 games while Heyward has averaged 18. Is Freeman a better hitter? Yeah he is. But the idea that Freeman is some superstar while Heyward is crap is false. Defense does matter and it's why Heyward is making more. Deal with it.
.218/.331/.261/.591 and an OPS+ of 62
That's what the Cubs have gotten for $184 million so far.
If you don't think Theo and Jed would love to have some of that money back to try to extend Arrieta with, you're kidding yourself.
there is a reason Swisher is in Scranton playing AAA hoping for a call up to (the not that much better than the Braves) Yankees instead of in KC
Scratch the surface little deeper and we would see Nick Swisher is fulla **** and had it been offered would be playing in Richmond.
hoping for a call up the the Braves.
Yeah, but Nick Swisher gets excited when his morning powerdump is successful.
.218/.331/.261/.591 and an OPS+ of 62
That's what the Cubs have gotten for $184 million so far.
If you don't think Theo and Jed would love to have some of that money back to try to extend Arrieta with, you're kidding yourself.
The Braves have not been in Richmond for a long, long time.
Heyward must have sodomized and/or sold crack to a lot of the board's family members, given the amount of vitriol he receives. It really does seem personal for a lot of these people.
The fact is, Freeman and Heyward are both very good players; they get there different ways, but the end result—that they're both just below that "truly great" echelon—is the same. And both are being paid accordingly. But just because you think some teams have overvalued defense in their contract negotiations—and the book is out: maybe they have—doesn't justify gross exaggerations and mis-characterizations regarding Heyward's productivity, nor does it justify the volume of smug dismissals of any opinion contrary to "teh Heywood sucks lolz you kiddin yourself".
Heyward must have sodomized and/or sold crack to a lot of the board's family members, given the amount of vitriol he receives.
Heyward must have sodomized and/or sold crack to a lot of the board's family members, given the amount of vitriol he receives. It really does seem personal for a lot of these people.
The fact is, Freeman and Heyward are both very good players; they get there different ways, but the end result—that they're both just below that "truly great" echelon—is the same. And both are being paid accordingly. But just because you think some teams have overvalued defense in their contract negotiations—and the book is out: maybe they have—doesn't justify gross exaggerations and mis-characterizations regarding Heyward's productivity, nor does it justify the volume of smug dismissals of any opinion contrary to "teh Heywood sucks lolz you kiddin yourself".
The opposite is also true.
I really like Heyward as a player and always have. I don't think he's a great hitter, I think his WAR is consistently overblown because of his stellar defense in RF, and I don't view him as a hitter you rely on. These views also get mocked by some. That doesn't mean I don't think he's a very good player. But if you didn't want to pay him $23M a year, some called you crazy. I'm a Heyward h8er because I don't think he's worth $23M and don't think he's a great hitter.
That would endear him to most of us, you'd think.