Tell me if I have this right
- the server data was subpoenaed for review, and the county deleted the records
- the county archived the data, but didn't give that to the auditors because the archives were not subpoenaed
- the county justified deleting the record for needing server space, but did not delete prior election data that was not under audit
- the county was unwilling to say under oath that this is their standard practice
--------------
If that doesn't raise any skepticism nothing will.
It's still a long way from proof the election was stolen, but that's a trick that should have landed someone in contempt for not complying with a subpoena. Good grief, they're either total incompetents or covering something up.
I'm waiting for rationale people like you to see the light.
I thought this might get you there.
There will be more.
An audit of the subpoenaed data would probably clear up a lot.
The only thing that clears things up is a full canvas of the country.
Thats where all the ghost voters will show up and the true trick as to how Democrats win elections.
This. The only way we'll catch the ghost voters now is if these idiots made the mistake of copying ballots instead of procuring real ones. It's hard to get your hand on a lot of ballots so there's a good chance the cheaters made copies themselves. The kinematic report is upcoming and will tell us if there are any of these copied ballots.
People aren't going to buy the copied ballots angle.
Die-hards like you and I know the ramifications about that but its just way to abstract for most people.
Its hard enough to explain to some people why the lack of chain of custody is a monster fraud flag.
Copied ballots on cheap typing paper is easy to detect and even a judge will notice it.
The right adopting the lefts tactics is a predictable outcome.
No excuse. It's the appropriate tactic to fight back rather than continue to be a doormat