I can't possibly understand why ANY NATS FANS would be upset with that deal - you're getting Scherzer at $10 million/year BELOW market value (at least) for the 7 years he pitches. Considering the fact that Mr. Lerner's financial advisors seem to be relatively adequate, investing that $70 million wisely will pay for the deferrals. Could that potentially cut into your bottom line after he retires? Slightly maybe. But a World Series win or two will offset that. Considering how much money they've got coming off the books and the consistent revenues growth MLB continues to provide, this was all but a no-brainer when Borass was able to convince him to accept the structure.
Pretty much assume 7.5 million a win and increase that by 5% per year. Subtract a half a win a year.
Where to start? He's been 4.5, 6.4, 5.6 over the past 3 years in the AL in front of terrible defense. (see transition Fister made to better defense/NL). I think a conservative estimate is 5 wins in year 1.
1- 5 wins (7.5/win)= 37.5 million
2- 4.5 wins (7.9/win = 35.4 million
3- 4 wins (8.27/win)= 33.1 million
4- 3.5 wins (8.7/win) = 30.5 million
5- 3 wins (9.1/win)= 27 million
6- 2.5 wins (9.6/win) = 23.9 million
7- 2 wins (10.1/win) = 20.2 million
24.5 projected WAR/ 208 million in value
Start at 4.5 and use same calculations and you get 21 WAR, 177 million in value. Start at 4 WAR and you get 17.5 WAR and 147 million in value. Obviously, every pitcher doesn't age the same, but that's a general rule. Obviously an injury makes the whole contract terrible.
The key here is they get ridiculous value early on in this contract. They could get a 5-6 WAR pitcher at a price of 2.5 to 3 million per win. That gives you the flexibility of truly going for it.