Official Offseason Thread

Enscheff said:
"the shift from foveal to peripheral vision (and vice versa) underlies the batter's perception of a break."

Says nothing about different types of break, or any way to classify breaking balls...which is what we are talking about.

Again...we know how to talk about curves precisely and accurately. We do not need to use terms like "late break". The only thing that article seems to suggest is that the actual movement on the pitch isn't why it's effective, only the perception of that movement...which we know to be false since curves with more movement produce measurably better results.
Click to expand...

Well, no. It's explicitly what I was talking about: the phenomenon of "late break" is about perception, and different from the actual lateral movement of the pitch.

That this phenomenon exists absolutely does not mean the movement of a curveball has no effect. I'm gonna blow your mind here, but two things can both exist. Take a minute to process.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Well, no. It's explicitly what I was talking about: the phenomenon of "late break" is about perception, and different from the actual lateral movement of the pitch.

That this phenomenon exists absolutely does not mean the movement of a curveball has no effect. I'm gonna blow your mind here, but two things can both exist. Take a minute to process.
Click to expand...

Yup. Only people who have actually played baseball would understand.
 
bravesfanMatt said:
Two way street. As more teams go to the fall backs the less teams are interested in signing him to a max plus deal. Say the Braves trade for KB. Now only two teams are left in the running.
Click to expand...

Particularly in this situation - IF his preference truly is to come back here if all things are relatively equal.

AA would obviously prefer to bring him back and keep the prospects (I think we all would), but at some point Donaldson potentially has to weigh the fact that the longer he drags this out the more chance the Cubs or Rockies cave and will take Riley as the centerpiece of a Bryant or Arenado deal because they really need the arms more than they need Pache/Waters over Riley. If the rumors that the three teams have 4 year offers on the table and his preference is to stay in Atlanta, is he honestly willing to go to Minnesota or Washington for $5 million more if AA happens not to be bluffing and has told them his best offer is on the table? If it's all about the bottom line, sure - but as much as many folks around here hate to see it happen, location preference often factors in to "all things being equal".
 
Sheffield10 said:
Yup. Only people who have actually played baseball would understand.
Click to expand...

I promise I played at a higher level than you.

Which major conference D1 school did you play at? Professionally? How many pro days in front of MLB scouts did you participate?
 
Last edited:
Metaphysicist said:
Well, no. It's explicitly what I was talking about: the phenomenon of "late break" is about perception, and different from the actual lateral movement of the pitch.

That this phenomenon exists absolutely does not mean the movement of a curveball has no effect. I'm gonna blow your mind here, but two things can both exist. Take a minute to process.
Click to expand...

We were talking about different types of breaking balls and how they are described objectively, not about how break is perceived in general.

I’m sorry if you weren’t following along.
 
Last edited:
Enscheff said:
I promise I played at a higher level than you.

Which major conference D1 school did you play at? Professionally? How many pro days in front of MLB scouts did you participate?
Click to expand...

Aw come on now, don't sell yourself short...

you're the best blackjack dealer that's ever posted on an internet message board too!!!
 
clvclv said:
Aw come on now, don't sell yourself short...

you're the best blackjack dealer that's ever posted on an internet message board too!!!
Click to expand...

Yup, athletic enough to play D1 ball and intelligent enough to write math software for a gaming company.

You’re...nothing. At all. A literal nothing.

Wait...you’re the best lifetime member of the IBWAA to spend $99 on said membership, call yourself the lead editor of a blog...that failed.

Well done boomer!!
 
Last edited:
Metaphysicist said:
Well, no. It's explicitly what I was talking about: the phenomenon of "late break" is about perception, and different from the actual lateral movement of the pitch.

That this phenomenon exists absolutely does not mean the movement of a curveball has no effect. I'm gonna blow your mind here, but two things can both exist. Take a minute to process.
Click to expand...

The laws of physics affect every ball equally regardless of who throws it. Gravity is the same for an 8 year old as it is for an mlb ace. There are a lot of adjectives that describe pitches such as “late break” “rising fastball” that aren’t correct when you apply physics the analysis. I would guess perception is affected by tunneling and sequencing more than any other factor.
 
Last edited:
JxnMissFan said:
The laws of physics affect every ball equally regardless of who throws it. Gravity is the same for an 8 year old as it is for an mlb ace. There are a lot of adjectives that describe pitches such as “late break” “rising fastball” that aren’t correct when you apply physics the analysis. I would guess perception is affected by tunneling and sequencing more than any other factor.
Click to expand...

We were discussing breaking balls in terms of “late” break vs “loopy” break, then meta swooped in and switched gears a bit showing why humans perceive pitch movement to be something other than a smooth curve.

He isn’t wrong, we just weren’t talking about the same thing.

Perhaps players better able to track the baseball and keep out of their peripheral view are better at seeing and hitting movement. Maybe that’s the physiological part of pitch recognition.
 
Enscheff said:
We were discussing breaking balls in terms of “late” break vs “loopy” break, then meta swooped in and switched gears a bit showing why humans perceive pitch movement to be something other than a smooth curve.

He isn’t wrong, we just weren’t talking about the same thing.

Perhaps players better able to track the baseball and keep out of their peripheral view are better at seeing and hitting movement. Maybe that’s the physiological part of pitch recognition.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Perception is definitely on the batter not the pitcher.
 
UNCBlue012 said:
You guys are so freaking boring. Jeez.
Click to expand...



5986d8f8850dc2627900e4d941705219.jpg
 
Nats just signed Starlin Castro, Rosenthal said it wont take them out of JD sweepstakes. Castro will play second. 2 years/12 mil is the deal.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top