Me too. I think that contract is going to be the most regrettable of the 2019 offseason.
Thirded. If he stays healthy and in the rotation all year, I think 40 HRs is nearly a given. And that's just year one.
Me too. I think that contract is going to be the most regrettable of the 2019 offseason.
Thirded. If he stays healthy and in the rotation all year, I think 40 HRs is nearly a given. And that's just year one.
I kinda hate to tell you guys ... but we are kinda already over the hump.... we had a WS in our lap and pitched a bad inning.
Thirded. If he stays healthy and in the rotation all year, I think 40 HRs is nearly a given. And that's just year one.
Bumgarner deal could be bad but 40 HR's is just over 1 HR per start. Even with juiced balls, he isnt THAT bad.
He gave up 30 last year while playing in a park that heavily suppresses them (although he gave up 15 at home and 15 on the road). He's about to be playing in a launching pad. I'm not sure I would bet on him giving up 40, but he is going to be giving up a whole bunch of dingers all year.
He had a 1.13 WHIP, 203 K's, and a .245 BAA last year, but the HR's are alarming.
Take all those numbers, then split them by his home/away numbers and see just how alarming it is. I mean, he was really, really, extra bad away from home last year.
I think you are making too much of the splits.
Park factors don't account for 3 runs a game.
He will likely pitch better at home in Arizona than he does on the road.
I'll take the under on 40 homers.
It was reported that if we got past STL, Freddie was out the rest of the postseason. And the Nats pitching would have completely shut us down. We should have beaten STL but the Nats would have beat us in 5.
I think you are making too much of the splits.
Park factors don't account for 3 runs a game.
He will likely pitch better at home in Arizona than he does on the road.
HR/FB is pretty random
Is it random when he's consistently shown it to be a problem for 3 straight years?