Sure, there's things that don't show up in the stat sheet that matter. I'm not discounting that and neither is everyone else. I think you're setting up a false narrative there.
I'm as big a fan of Maybin as there is. I wanted to sign him after he was DFA'd, before the Kimbrel trade even happened. I like him for completely irrational reasons, as well as for the fact that I think is good ballplayer. He's a WNC homie, he's obviously happy here, and he goes balls out on every play, and I appreciate that.
I'm not picking a fight with you, per se. I am speaking against people who have grasped a narrative and ignored actual results. I think we've held our own mostly because we've replaced BJ with Maybin and CJ with some combination of better players. Do I see hope for the future? Sure. Do I see the sprinkling of Braves Way fairy dust and contact hitters and "playing the game the right way" as the ultimate answer? Absolutely not. I see better players as the answer.
My bottom line is that I'd like to see people be a little more forthright about what we are this year. Do you feel good about a 72-75 win club? Cool. Just don't try to convince me that they're more than they are, or that a couple of injuries and trades are the difference between this club in the playoffs.
I don't see it as looking to pick a fight at all. Simply differing opinions.
I actually do think that if you added a couple of impact players to the club - as currently constructed - would actually make it pretty "competitive" in the sense you're using. Again, that's the difference between statheads and scoutheads IMO. What I find tough to swallow is that the same people that say that this team would've been competitive for one more season if it would've kept Heyward, J-Up, and Gattis can't see that that would've been the wrong approach since it was going "all-in" on a roster that hadn't made it beyond a Wild Card game.
I don't imagine you disagree with the idea that IF they'd have taken another shot with those guys that the team would've had to be completely rebuilt following 2015. Heyward and J-Up would've left for greener pastures - win or lose. As a fan, I've been in favor of "taking a shot" when you feel like you have one - parades ought to be the goal. Of course if that would have been the approach, there wouldn't have been any assets to trade - making the process take that much longer.
However, I have a really tough time hearing the same people scream that the franchise should've taken that shot turn around and blast JS for doing the exact same thing with the Wainright/Drew and prospects for Tex deals. What, exactly, is the difference? When they made those deals, they thought they had enough pieces in place that Drew or Tex could be that difference-maker. The same people that wanted to keep the guys traded this winter also mention Justin's streakiness and Heyward's lack of power when it fits their argument.
My personal point all along has been that taking another shot with those guys and their flaws wasn't likely to yield a different outcome than it had before since we just didn't have the other pieces to back them up. Again, it's just my opinion, but the return Hart & Company got was far better than two draft picks in the #30-#40 range in the 2016 Draft. If you (or anyone else) can show me numbers that PROVE keeping last year's team together would've somehow led to Justin and Heyward performing better than they have for their new teams and the 2015 Braves would advance deeper into October, I'll be the first (and loudest) person to say I was wrong.
Does anyone honestly believe that that team could've been a legitimate contender with the 2015 versions of Harang, Teheran, and Wood as the guys you'd run out there against good teams?