OT Immaculate Grid

Current smallest percentages I have is LA/ATL ANdy Ashby 0.01%. I ****ed up cause I thought Abreu was a royal so I was using him as a yankee royal, then just said **** it you're yankee dodger. Also I coudln't figure out a gold glove winner with 300 wins, besides maddux, did Glavine ever win it? My highest in the BRaves column was Cy Young at 0.3%
 
zitothebrave said:
Current smallest percentages I have is LA/ATL ANdy Ashby 0.01%. I ****ed up cause I thought Abreu was a royal so I was using him as a yankee royal, then just said **** it you're yankee dodger. Also I coudln't figure out a gold glove winner with 300 wins, besides maddux, did Glavine ever win it? My highest in the BRaves column was Cy Young at 0.3%
Click to expand...

I think Maddux and Carlton are the only two options in the bottom right square.
 
zitothebrave said:
Current smallest percentages I have is LA/ATL ANdy Ashby 0.01%. I ****ed up cause I thought Abreu was a royal so I was using him as a yankee royal, then just said **** it you're yankee dodger. Also I coudln't figure out a gold glove winner with 300 wins, besides maddux, did Glavine ever win it? My highest in the BRaves column was Cy Young at 0.3%
Click to expand...

There's no way Glavine won it. Maddux basically won it every year he played lol. I think one of the few years he didn't win it, didn't Mike Hampton win it while with us?
 
Finally got home after a long day. Went to recheck my numbers from earlier at work.

Lockhart at .3%
Todd Hollandsworth at .02%
Betemit at .2%
Ibanez at 1% (KC/NYY)
Gaylord Perry at 1% (300W/NYY)

Obviously used Maddog just because. And Spahnie because Knucksie, Madddog, Glavine would have been too obvious. 7% for Spahnie.

The only square I ****ed up is KC/Gold Glove. I still sometimes get confused if it means any player who won a gold glove and played for the Royals. Not a player who won a gold glove while playing in KC.

I put Jeff Francoeur just to try and see how low that % would be knowing he didn't win one with KC but did win one.
 
Today I learned that 2 HOFers who each won an MVP award, hit .300 for most of their prime, and hit primarily in the 1st 2 positions of the lineup, never had a 200 hit season.

Those guys are Barry Larkin and Rickey Henderson. I knew I should have stuck with Pete Rose, but I thought Larkin would be a lower %. Looks like Miguel Tejada is the only Oakland Athletic to ever have 200 hits and the only Athletic in general to have 200 hits in the last 87 years. That is just crazy.
 
Carp said:
Today I learned that 2 HOFers who each won an MVP award, hit .300 for most of their prime, and hit primarily in the 1st 2 positions of the lineup, never had a 200 hit season.

Those guys are Barry Larkin and Rickey Henderson. I knew I should have stuck with Pete Rose, but I thought Larkin would be a lower %. Looks like Miguel Tejada is the only Oakland Athletic to ever have 200 hits and the only Athletic in general to have 200 hits in the last 87 years. That is just crazy.
Click to expand...

I used Tejada for Baltimore in the 200 hits category
 
I couldn't think of any Red but Pete Rose. I gambled on BJ Surhoff for Baltimore (he had that one season he killed it) and he never took a walk. I think it was the year before we traded for him. That wa smy second lowest after CIN/STL, Terry Pendleton. Don't know where I thought he played for the reds but I swore I remembered it.

But yeah 4 of 9 were top guesses (Rose, Wieters, Baines, and Thomas)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top