AerchAngel
<B>Secretary of Statistics</B>
Okay, that is funny. Nice.
Judd LegumVerified account @JuddLegum
This is the 19th school shooting this year
we still have 10 1/2 months to go in 2018
not just mass shooting like at dance halls,bars or malls
schools!
Will anything change ?
Not while the NRA is in charge
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/20...the-2016-election-and-won-almost-all-of-them/
The NRA’s largest 2016 outlay was the $30.3 million it spent in support of Trump.
but hey, a number of you will get a couple hundred a month ----
Fake news. One of those '19' school shoots was at a local college here where a gun was accidentally discharged.
#guncontrolnow
What does that mean.
What does that look like
How does that stop this shooting
You keep demanding specifics but never offer any of your own
Never heard back on this
[TW]964513796126486529[/TW]
But more important how would any of these reforms stop any of these shootings. Types and variation of these guns have been available for decades. The phenomenon of mass shootings is a relatively recent change. Its not the guns that are the problem and until everyone realizes that we will never find a solution.
Saying that the guns aren't the problem is an incredibly myopic evasion of the fact that the guns, and their kind, quantity, and cost are clearly a problem.
The only thing a tax on weapons does is restrict the second amendment from the middle to poor class of people. If thats what you're willing to do then so be it but don't pretend that a tax isn't an effective repeal for those that can't afford to pay.
However, for those that are willing to go down in a blaze of glory a one time expenditure with no future plans is meaningless.
Well the idea IS to reduce the amount of guns and ammo in circulation. I really don't care about the redistributive aspects of the tax. Tobacco taxes are regressive too. But I am in favor of some income redistribution/safety net for the poor. Those kinds of programs can offset the regressive impact of gun/ammo/tobacco taxes.
The tobacco tax is to discourage kids from smoking because it is killing them. They include obvious addictive elements that begin a culture of smoking. This absolutely has to be discouraged at a young age when the kids are most vulnerable. Making them expensive makes sense as kids cannot afford that type of expense while they are in the developmental years.
I just don't see the correlation personally.
Higher prices will reduce purchases...of just about anything. Having a large number of guns and ammunition in circulation is as much of a social bad as smoking. There is an enormous social benefit from reducing both. Make the taxes high enough and you can reduce other taxes. Someday someone will be smart enough to offer a deal along these lines to the voters. Tax guns/ammo/tobacco/carbon fuels and eliminate all other taxes.