All I'm saying is they have been comparable players over the past 4 years, you could even argue Gordon has been better.
WAR past 4 season:
Gordon: 6.6, 5.6, 3.5, 6.6
Heyward: 2.0, 6.3, 3.4, 5.1
This idea that we can't replace Heywood with 20 million dollars a year + whatever players/prospects we get is ridiculous. He isn't Babe Ruth. Maybe we don't replace his a carbon copy of Heywood but we can improve other areas to make up for the difference. I would rather have average players at 2b/3b/cf/Rf than have Heyward and 3 black holes fill those spots.