That’s an unfair criticism. There’s nothing suggesting the OP doesn’t know why Walmart would possibly do such a thing. But retail AP measures always run into conflict with sales measures, and making the shopping experience untenable for honest customers is still a choice the company made. If I can’t go into a Walmart and buy a thing of laundry detergent without waiting ten minutes for an employee, I will also take my business elsewhere. That’s not being woke, it’s capitalism.
Yeah but do we all collectively understand why companies feel they must do this?That’s an unfair criticism. There’s nothing suggesting the OP doesn’t know why Walmart would possibly do such a thing. But retail AP measures always run into conflict with sales measures, and making the shopping experience untenable for honest customers is still a choice the company made. If I can’t go into a Walmart and buy a thing of laundry detergent without waiting ten minutes for an employee, I will also take my business elsewhere. That’s not being woke, it’s capitalism.
Sure, companies don’t just make their products harder to buy for no reason. But I also support consumers using their wallet and voice to tell these companies they should try a different approach, particularly since one solution would just be to staff their stores better.Yeah but do we all collectively understand why companies feel they must do this?
But do we collectively understand WHY companies are choosing this route?Sure, companies don’t just make their products harder to buy for no reason. But I also support consumers using their wallet and voice to tell these companies they should try a different approach, particularly since one solution would just be to staff their stores better.
Yes, it’s because of theft in predominantly black communities. I suspect we might disagree on the root causes of certain crime demographics, but I’m not arguing the reasons companies do this are different than what they are. I’m simply arguing (as the OP did) those choices are short-sighted and could have long-term consequences on sales.But do we collectively understand WHY companies are choosing this route?
Problem won't be solved til we start actually locking chiefs in prisonYes, it’s because of theft in predominantly black communities. I suspect we might disagree on the root causes of certain crime demographics, but I’m not arguing the reasons companies do this are different than what they are. I’m simply arguing (as the OP did) those choices are short-sighted and could have long-term consequences on sales.
I understand the thought process, but I do question the favorability of the trade-off. I’m sure much more qualified people than I have crunched these numbers, but I am somewhat skeptical that this solution is better in the long run. I’d maybe consider dropping the product line altogether in that market before making it too hard to legally purchase, especially when one considers the increased labor involved in selling it.Those companies determined people actually purchasing their products 1:1 ratio was better than seeing a good percentage stolen
Not a shocker.
While they may gross less, less walks out the door unpaid for
Not sure how that’s hard math
There is no solution other than requiring memberships into the store.I understand the thought process, but I do question the favorability of the trade-off. I’m sure much more qualified people than I have crunched these numbers, but I am somewhat skeptical that this solution is better in the long run. I’d maybe consider dropping the product line altogether in that market before making it too hard to legally purchase, especially when one considers the increased labor involved in selling it.