Rafael Cruz Discussion

[AerchAngel]

Good to see Cruz is no better than Sanders.. no principles at all

I don't know about that. If the clownish KKK Mad Hatter actually wins against the Corrupted No Morals Lying Felon B*tch known as sHillary, getting that Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime appointment and any lawyer worth a grain of salt will think that is the crown jewel of a job. Why not swing for the fences and loyalty be damned?

 

[Oklahomahawk]

I don't know about that. If the clownish KKK Mad Hatter actually wins against the Corrupted No Morals Lying Felon B*tch known as sHillary, getting that Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime appointment and any lawyer worth a grain of salt will think that is the crown jewel of a job. Why not swing for the fences and loyalty be damned?

First of all that we must vote Repub because of the Supreme Court nominees is not a legitimate argument IMO. In theory I might say otherwise, but in the real world it means nothing, after all the Repubs controlled the White House for 28 out of the 40 years from 1968-2008, and they couldn't manage to get enough pro-life justices on there to overturn Roe v Wade (IMO the #1 argument the vote Repubs regardless crowd has) and there aren't enough Dems who ever want to get re-elected to put enough justices on there to try and mess with the 2nd amendment since that would be instant political death for any who did. The only way the 2nd amendment will ever get effed with is if enough of Congress wants to put forth a new amendment to overturn or weaken the 2nd amendment and even that would take 2/3 of them and 3/4 of the states and that simply ain't happening, Dem, Repub, or whatever.

 

[Oklahomahawk]

Oh and there's no way Trump would be misguided enough to put Rafael on the court, most of his own party wouldn't vote to confirm him.

I'll tell you all what though, that Harriet Myers nomination by W is starting to look better and better though, with the thought of Cruz getting the nod.

 

[AerchAngel]

First of all that we must vote Repub because of the Supreme Court nominees is not a legitimate argument IMO. In theory I might say otherwise, but in the real world it means nothing, after all the Repubs controlled the White House for 28 out of the 40 years from 1968-2008, and they couldn't manage to get enough pro-life justices on there to overturn Roe v Wade (IMO the #1 argument the vote Repubs regardless crowd has) and there aren't enough Dems who ever want to get re-elected to put enough justices on there to try and mess with the 2nd amendment since that would be instant political death for any who did. The only way the 2nd amendment will ever get effed with is if enough of Congress wants to put forth a new amendment to overturn or weaken the 2nd amendment and even that would take 2/3 of them and 3/4 of the states and that simply ain't happening, Dem, Repub, or whatever.

Great post.

That is why vote for "No confidence" will resonate. I will stick to local elections, half and half on Pubs and Dems.