REAL FOOTBALL Thread

Heyward said:
Jets, Chargers, Raiders, Steelers, Ravens.
Click to expand...

LMAO! Are you kidding me?

Jets have Holmes, Hill, and Winslow for most of these season.
Chargers - Royal, Gates, Woodhead, Matthews, Allen
Steelers have Bell, Brown, Sanders, and Miller
Ravens have Rice, Smith, and Jones. All are better options than any current WR/TE/RB on the Pats

Only argument you have is the Raiders. They at least have Moore who's a legit #1. The pats have a decent running game and...... Julian Edelman.
 
LOL, shows what you know about the Jets. You didn't even list their best receiver.

Winslow is garbage and Holmes is not what he was. Hill should be good but he is still too inconsistent with his route running and hands.
 
LMAO, apparently you don't know anything about the Jets. Who is their best WR then if not Hill or Holmes? Kerley? Based on what? Cause it damn sure ain't production.

Holmes is their best WR by far, when he's healthy. Which hasn't been that often this yr, but he's played morea lot more than Amendola or Gronk.

Winslow isn't great and I never said he was but he had become a safety net for Smith before the susspension. And he's still infinitely better than the scrubs that Brady has run out there at TE so far.
 
Trading a first for T-Rich was moronic. It doesn't matter how you spin it. Some of you guys are still too hyped up on pre draft rankings. Look at Mark Ingram, is he the power back option for the Saints? Has he done anything for them?

Im guessing this trade was made by that idiot owner, Irsay. "We will trade for a RB!" Richardson is a one trick poney if that. If you just want a guy that can get you 3 yards and maybe be effective at the goal line, there are other backs that you could have for much cheaper....Brandon Jacobs was on the street, right?

Here are the Colts backs:

Richardson 61 carrier 3.1 ypa
Bradshaw 41 careers 4.5 ypa
Brown 22 carrier 7.8 ypa
Ballard 13 carries 4.8 ypa

I guess holes are open for other guys, but not him? Richardson CAREER long run is 27 yards. 27 YARDS!
 
Heyward said:
Jets, Chargers, Raiders, Steelers, Ravens.
Click to expand...

the Chargers? Are you serious? The Ravens???? Torrey Smith?????? Jones and Brown????? The Steelers??????? Brown and Sanders.....dude please stop you're a joke. Lets say that all those teams have worse weapons, they don't, but lets say they do....that means the Pats would be the 6th worst....unless I'm missing something, that's still really awful.

I'll give you the Jets and Raiders
 
BRule said:
the Chargers? Are you serious? The Ravens???? Torrey Smith?????? Jones and Brown????? The Steelers??????? Brown and Sanders.....dude please stop you're a joke. Lets say that all those teams have worse weapons, they don't, but lets say they do....that means the Pats would be the 6th worst....unless I'm missing something, that's still really awful.

I'll give you the Jets and Raiders
Click to expand...

Yes.

Chargers have Gates and after that, their receivers are all not so proven, Keenan Allen is a beast though.

Yes, Bal has Torrey, after that it's a bunch of secondary guys.

Steelers may be better but not by much.
 
Heyward said:
Yes.

Chargers have Gates and after that, their receivers are all not so proven, Keenan Allen is a beast though.

Yes, Bal has Torrey, after that it's a bunch of secondary guys.

Steelers may be better but not by much.
Click to expand...

Is this a joke?
 
Heyward said:
No more than you saying Miami would win a title without Wade which is borderline retarded.
Click to expand...

Heyward - All these teams have worse weapons

Me - How So?

Heyward - *proceeds to list all the weapons those teams have, not realizing he is making my point for me*
 
Amendola, Thompkins, Dobson, Edelman, Gronk is apparently the worst weapons in football.

Smh.
 
Uhhh, Sanders, Cotchery, Miller.

The Pats have zero tight ends and all scrub WRers except an undrafted raw WRer with some talent.
 
The Steeler inclusion is bad but the Ravens one is way worse....they have a top 10 WR in the league, in Smith.

Heyward is THE worst.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top