zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
You're higher. A few people did, but not lots. Pats showed no cracks in the armor. Unless you count playing the Chargers pretty close.
What is wrong with it? Last year, Brady was rather average. 100 is average.
Brady:
Year Att Y/A+ NY/A+ AY/A+ ANY/A+ Cmp%+ TD%+ Int%+ Sack%+ Rate+
2013* 628 96 98 102 103 98 96 116 104 102
On top of simple stats, actually watching these two play it should be obvious that they were not elite last year. They both had down years. If you say otherwise, you are delusional.
Matt Ryan was even worse.
Year Att Y/A+ NY/A+ AY/A+ ANY/A+ Cmp%+ TD%+ Int%+ Sack%+ Rate+
2013 651 96 97 97 98 124 96 101 101 105
I am sorry, but being average or below it pretty much across the board is not good. Who cares what they have done in their careers; basing the receiving corps partly on QB influence, as I did, was/is largely based on where they stood at the end of last year, going into this year. Where these two were at least year was average, not elite.
I am done feeding the trolls, now.
Lot of people did.
Pats showed cracks in the armor late in the year and the Giants had all the momentum in the world, i wasnt all that surprised.
What is wrong with it? Last year, Brady was rather average. 100 is average.
Brady:
Year Att Y/A+ NY/A+ AY/A+ ANY/A+ Cmp%+ TD%+ Int%+ Sack%+ Rate+
2013* 628 96 98 102 103 98 96 116 104 102
On top of simple stats, actually watching these two play it should be obvious that they were not elite last year. They both had down years. If you say otherwise, you are delusional.
Matt Ryan was even worse.
Year Att Y/A+ NY/A+ AY/A+ ANY/A+ Cmp%+ TD%+ Int%+ Sack%+ Rate+
2013 651 96 97 97 98 124 96 101 101 105
I am sorry, but being average or below it pretty much across the board is not good. Who cares what they have done in their careers; basing the receiving corps partly on QB influence, as I did, was/is largely based on where they stood at the end of last year, going into this year. Where these two were at least year was average, not elite.
I am done feeding the trolls, now.
DYAR is a counting stat. Always going to look better for a guy who plays on a team that always passes the ball.
For one, it's Tom Brady. And his receiving core should be much improved from last season, especially if people stay healthy. And despite all of that, the Pats were still the 2nd best team in the AFC last yr
So we are to believe a 14 point underdog upsetting an undefeated Pats team wasn't a surprise?
Becauuse it's harder to do great things over and over again.
Sure it is. But just blindly looking at DYAR cheapens guys that get it done more efficiently and consistently.
It's the same WR/TE's as last year but LaFell for Collie when you really look at it![]()
Cool stats. Maybe in a few years you'll start looking at real stats.
Like this one.
Matt Ryan DYAR rank 4
Tom Brady DYAR rank 6
Colin Chokernick DYAR rank 8
That's with Brady and Ryan having so much going against them weapon wise last year.
Clearly someone doesn't understand the definition of statistics. Hint: It isn't me.
Notice how I never mention Kap's name in this discussion, however, you keep adding it in. When I mentioned the Niners, I mentioned only their receivers. I included QBs after that, and never mentioned Kap, but said that NE and ATL's poor WR play / injuries coupled with QBs who played league average last year keep their corps lower than SFs corps. Keep putting words in my mouth, though; it makes for great debates.Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. You basically just said Kaepernick is better than Ryan and/or Brady and I don't understand statistics.
SF waives Jonathan Baldwin
Thethe remember when they made that trade and you said it was a steal?
SF waives Jonathan Baldwin
Thethe remember when they made that trade and you said it was a steal?