Republican voter suppression...

cajunrevenge said:
He just doesmt want commies voting and he defines commie as anyone who isnt a sycophant for Trump. Which is ironic because he wanted to dismantle a whole lot of rights and constitutional clauses.
Click to expand...

it's always an honor to be called a commie by him and your boy lil thethe
 
the best cunt boy tactic

how is my very specific, not happening or even argued for scenario not a violation of my rights?

lol

but if you want to argue that people should go house to house to collect votes, i'm down for that too

we could just do it online with a safe and secure way we do the census too though instead


"if we don't give them a steak, how is that not voter suppression?" is something the dude that tries to say he's the adult and smart one practically typed out and thought was clever and a good retort to own people
 
The point of the exercise was to see if the lecturer agreed to imposing some sort of hurdle to jump through to vote is voter suppression.
 
The racist tyrant doesn't wanna play ball on his support for voter suppression.

I wish less racist tyrants voted

(Theres another new post for you bump into the wind)
 
it's ok dude...the message boards are for discussion...and the discussion is more lively when there is disagreement...we can agree to disagree on how important participatory democracy is

i understand you see it as something that threatens your rights
 
I think the less parties that touch a vote the better.

Simply because each party that touches a vote is an opportunity for influence or errors.

Those will inevitably lead to a mistake or open an opportunity for misdeeds.

Not a fan of the USPS even being involved in the voting process as they are another layer of opportunity and WILDLY inefficient

Voting needs to be a direct process and I don't necessarily mean the way its done for everyone now.
 
Tapate50 said:
I think the less parties that touch a vote the better.

Simply because each party that touches a vote is an opportunity for influence or errors.

Those will inevitably lead to a mistake or open an opportunity for misdeeds.

Not a fan of the USPS even being involved in the voting process as they are another layer of opportunity and WILDLY inefficient

Voting needs to be a direct process and I don't necessarily mean the way its done for everyone now.
Click to expand...

I think the idea is to try to make voting both easy and as free of fraud as possible.

The tradeoff that gets to both goals is to restrict mail in voting and expand early in person voting.

I can understand and support the shift to mail in voting during the pandemic. But I do think it opens up more risk of fraud. So I'm fine with tightening that up going forward.
 
goldfly said:
ok

you should call corporate i guess
Click to expand...

They know, just don't care. So i'd be surprised if mr coca cola cared actually.

I got a text message telling me to sign a petition for this exact issue/company. Not sure how that works either.
 
Tapate50 said:
They know, just don't care. So i'd be surprised if mr coca cola cared actually.

I got a text message telling me to sign a petition for this exact issue/company. Not sure how that works either.
Click to expand...

you should stop misgendering ms coca cola
 
Tapate50 said:
Impossible

CEO's of all major companies are all misogynistic straight white men.
Click to expand...

i know some of you look at a coke bottle a certain way...but as a PSA i need to remind y'all that genitalia ≠ gender

from my point of view it looks androgynous

either way i have confirmation it is ms coca cola
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top