bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Don't worry. When the stock market collapses again, surely thethe will be here to heap praise on Trump.
Don't worry. When the stock market collapses again, surely thethe will be here to heap praise on Trump.
Oh the market will come back down - that much is for sure. But we will see where the economy is as a whole.
No, they don't. No, it isn't. No, it doesn't. No, it isn't. Source?
Your claims about the economy are generally pretty hyperbolic. I'd assume that whatever growth we're seeing because of expected tax policy and corporate confidence would have happened under a generic Republican. If given the choice, I'd take the generic Republican economic regime and a lower chance of an international incident based on a Twitter beef.
Was the offensive against ISIS planned and implemented after January 20, 2017?
But this is his presidency and he did push tax reform from the very beginning. Trumps presidency is the one that is beinga ccused of being the worst of all time. The economy says otherwise. Your unwillingness to give Trump any credit on the economy reeks of partisianship. The elimination of burdensome regulation is another great thing that Trump did immediately.
The generals themselves have said they have more freedom. Obama administration micromanaged any conflict because they were concerned about backlash. When you are dealing with animals you don't hesitate. YOu act. It is undeniable the gains that we have made against ISIS after Obama allowed them to grow calling them a JV team and of course ignoring Hezbollah which is a completely different discussion.
This link does absolutely nothing to prove your larger point, about which the available data seems to say otherwise.
Give me specifics of the interfering... what did they physically do to effect the the election?
Darn it I was really hoping for an answer here
Hacked Podesta's emails and disseminated them.
And that has been proven without a shadow of doubt? Bc I thought wikileaks distributed.
Meanwhile, was the hacking what hurt HRC or the content? What matters?
And that has been proven without a shadow of doubt? Bc I thought wikileaks distributed.
Meanwhile, was the hacking what hurt HRC or the content? What matters?
Alright 103 pages, it looks like the usual suspects have started to move on from collusion. Is that right?
I've said it before: Trump deserves significant credit for the market rally. That doesn't change the fact that you're massively hyperbolic about the economy relative to past years and past presidents.
There is really not much practical difference between Obama and Trump policy on ISIS.
Apparently the "collusion" they were referring to all along was between Michael Wolff and Steve Bannon.
To the extent the intelligence services have been able to pinpoint it, the individual(s) or organization(s) responsible are associated with the moniker Fancy Bear, who seems to work for the Russians.
To the extent the intelligence services have been able to pinpoint it, the individual(s) or organization(s) responsible are associated with the moniker Fancy Bear, who seems to work for the Russians.