Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

[video=youtube;LnOjzAEELkA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=190&v=LnOjzAEELkA[/video]
 
thethe said:
What's the motive for people in power to hold their power? Think that's self explanatory.

Again, when that proof comes in for Russia hacking the dnc then I'll change my tune. Oherwise I don't see how the current administration benefited from russia.

Such a basic fact to confirm. Russia interference is not Facebook ads. That's just a little food for the trolls to be happy with the investigstion. Russia interference was always about wikileaks. Don't pretend that's not the case. The fact that they haven't been able to prove that at this point should tell you what you need to know. I guess the DNC wold have to let the FBI actually investigate the server first. I suppose having a third party company is good enough for national security.
Click to expand...

Sure you will.

Examine your reasoning here. All of these officials and functionaries--and how many would it take to execute this kind of massive conspiracy?--all of them, you're saying, somehow depended on a Clinton win in order to "hold their power." That's the profound silliness at the heart of this. To say nothing of the fact that the conclusion about the Russian interference hasn't changed since Trump's appointees took over. Coats, Pompeo, Wray, Reed, McMaster...all of them have confirmed the conclusion.
 
Julio3000 said:
Sure you will.

Examine your reasoning here. All of these officials and functionaries--and how many would it take to execute this kind of massive conspiracy?--all of them, you're saying, somehow depended on a Clinton win in order to "hold their power." That's the profound silliness at the heart of this. To say nothing of the fact that the conclusion about the Russian interference hasn't changed since Trump's appointees took over. Coats, Pompeo, Wray, Reed, McMaster...all of them have confirmed the conclusion.
Click to expand...

I've actually proved that I would change my tune when evidence came out. That evidence just happened to have been fake news so it's all good for me.

You however still wot backtrack from previous positions in spite of evidence such as bias in Muellers team and voter fraud (pennslyvania). It'd OK though. Pride always cometh before the fall. Even for someone as smart as you
 
"I smell alcohol on your breath."

"You'd be drinking too if the FBI Special Counsel was sending you subpoenas."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
thethe said:
I've actually proved that I would change my tune when evidence came out. That evidence just happened to have been fake news so it's all good for me.

You however still wot backtrack from previous positions in spite of evidence such as bias in Muellers team and voter fraud (pennslyvania). It'd OK though. Pride always cometh before the fall. Even for someone as smart as you
Click to expand...

Ok, well when we see, ahem, evidence of widespread voter fraud (as opposed to limited registration and voting irregularity), we can talk about that. The Pennsylvania DMV situation involves "several hundred" erroneous registrations over the course of several years, about half of whom were thought to have voted. That doesn't really contradict my position on voter fraud. Those are correctable errors which I would guess would be largely alleviated as Real ID is rolled out nationwide.

As for bias on the Mueller team...you're arguing a position that is neither proven nor easily provable, and questionably relevant, besides (i.e. prosecutors have a legally-protected right to have political opinions and are subject to a code of conduct thereto). I'm not sure why backtracking is in order.
 
Buried in that Jane Mayer piece was an allegation that the head of GCHQ flew to Washington to brief John Brennan on a "stream of illicit communications" between the Trump campaign and Russia. That seems like it might be rather a big deal.
 
Hawk said:
Seeking attention? This dude is having a complete mental breakdown.
Click to expand...

His misuse of "could care less" is the real story here. It's 2018. Use Google to find the right way to use an expression if you can't logically deduce it on your own.
 
Julio3000 said:
Ok, well when we see, ahem, evidence of widespread voter fraud (as opposed to limited registration and voting irregularity), we can talk about that. The Pennsylvania DMV situation involves "several hundred" erroneous registrations over the course of several years, about half of whom were thought to have voted. That doesn't really contradict my position on voter fraud. Those are correctable errors which I would guess would be largely alleviated as Real ID is rolled out nationwide.

As for bias on the Mueller team...you're arguing a position that is neither proven nor easily provable, and questionably relevant, besides (i.e. prosecutors have a legally-protected right to have political opinions and are subject to a code of conduct thereto). I'm not sure why backtracking is in order.
Click to expand...

I guess you missed the article I referenced about lawsuit filed where it was determined over 100k illegals were registered to vote? Just another 'glitch' I suppose.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.wash...awsuit-100000-noncitizens-registered-vote-pa/

Still fighting the good fight on bias. My word you are dug into your ideological trench. How it can be even debated at this point after the reveal of those conversations is beyond me.

How about when you denied the dossier played a role in the fisa warrant? Care to go down that rabbit hole again? The fact that the Democrat memo didn't even refute McCabe testimony tells us all we need to know. So what was once a conspiracy (voter fraud / bias / use of the dossier) is now the truth. Care to dismiss anything else as a conspiracy?

Further, you're awfully quiet on the carnage migrants are causing in Europe. Even the times had to admit that Sweden is a disaster now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top