Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Liar in chief:

President Obama’s top White House lawyer, Gregory B. Craig, was indicted yesterday on very serious charges. This is a really big story, but the Fake News New York Times didn’t even put it on page one, rather page 16. @washingtonpost not much better, “tiny” page one. Corrupt News!

Someone actually setting the record straight instead of lying

True, well, except for that part where Craig was White House Counsel from 2009 to 2010. He resigned after being ASKED TO LEAVE BY OBAMA and returned to private practice. The indictment is for alleged FARA violations that occurred in 2017, SEVEN years AFTER he left the White House
 
I could be wrong but my theory on why Julio and nsacpi have stopped posting since the Mueller report...

They both are embarrassed for falling for a non evidence conspiracy theory and are taking time to reflect on how they were so manipulated in an effort to be cured from their TDS

Good for them.

57, runnin, and Goldy have decided to double down on the conspiracy and it will be fun to laugh at them again
 
Where did I double down? Hell, I’m not even sure where I put my first bet but I’ll take any quotes you got

The report still isn’t out btw
 
57034619_606360073108265_6072611623674052608_n.png
 
I think the next democrat president should use the Trump strategy. Act guilty as hell and refuse to release anything, then after the opposition investigates and finds no crime you high step like you won something. This guy complaining about witch hunts went on about the birth certificate long after it was proved. There was the 5 kids exonerate of murder and even after they found the killer he still said they should be put to death.
 
Rantt Media
‏ @RanttMedia
4h4 hours ago

President Trump went from calling the Mueller report he hadn't

read yet a "total and complete exoneration" to calling Mueller and his team treasonous.

The reason for that is simple: it doesn't exonerate him.


we'll see !!!.

Read that White House staffers brought before Grand Jury are expecting retaliation
that being one of the reasons of redactions.
I dont know if that is a something or preventive medicine
 
Appears you dumbasses fell for Trumps BS yet again.


Arianna Huffington
‏Verified account @ariannahuff
2m2 minutes ago

Do people usually prepare an

“aggressive response” to reports that

“exonerate” them?

Asking for a friend.
 
think this about covers it



Oliver Willis
‏Verified account @owillis

trump's ag gave him a heads-up,
cleared him, let him see the information,
held on to it for a month,
still won't release it all,
then
had trump announce the press conference
which will be held *before*
america gets to see
the still-incomplete report.


meanwhile Trump runs around the country inciting violence aimed at a member of Congress.

did we miss anything ?
 
think this about covers it



Oliver Willis
‏Verified account @owillis

trump's ag gave him a heads-up,
cleared him, let him see the information,
held on to it for a month,
still won't release it all,
then
had trump announce the press conference
which will be held *before*
america gets to see
the still-incomplete report.


meanwhile Trump runs around the country inciting violence aimed at a member of Congress.

did we miss anything ?

This is literally standard procedure.

Why dont you wait to see it, read it, and then decide?

Why do you insist on making up your mind already? You are doubling down on the same mistake over and over and over again. How many times do you need to be wrong before you exercise some caution?
 
This is literally standard procedure.
Why dont you wait to see it, read it, and then decide?

Why do you insist on making up your mind already? You are doubling down on the same mistake over and over and over again. How many times do you need to be wrong before you exercise some caution?

a) I have live through 3 (edit 4) Special Proprietorial inquiries. No, it is not standard procedure,
Which is the point

b) because I am good at math. 2+2=4

c) and what mistake is that? Double down, I am not a gambler that "doubles down"

d) wrong? says who AG Barr ?

I am willing to wait and see to decide. Have always been. All I have ever wanted was an investigation -- same as Kavanaugh - same as outing Valarie Plame - same as Iran-Contra- etc etc etc

The question today is whether we ever get to see the full report !!
or just get Trumps version. Unsworn testimony if you will
 
Last edited:
Barr going with the legal theory that Trump could not have corrupt intent when obstructing the investigation because there was no collusion was found.
 
Nate Silver
‏Verified account @NateSilver538
1m1 minute ago

Basic political takeaway so far is that the WH is playing this for a draw rather than a win. They don't care if they appear partisan so long as their base is happy, because Democrats aren't gonna like Trump anyway and swing voters are exhausted and don't care much about Russia.
 
Back
Top