Enough with Seth Rich. Respect the family's request and keep his name out of nickle and dime conspiracy theories
You would certainly like it if people stopped investigating.
Enough with Seth Rich. Respect the family's request and keep his name out of nickle and dime conspiracy theories
You would certainly like it if people stopped investigating.
What's your take on Vince Foster. I am sincerely curious.
Why was Manafort Campaign Manager?
correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you a year ago that pooh poohed, perhaps even mocked the mere thought of Russian involvement ?
My thinking ? the political kids table around here is awfully crowded
Russia interfering in American affairs is nothing new. Turnabout is fair play.
and let's go a little further back to a conversation you (Hawk) and I had when Trump first proposed dropping the sanctions on Put.. I mean Russia and you argued in favor of Trumps proposal.
Where did the information originate that formulated your opinion ?
yeah, if memory serves the Gerald Ford campaign once they found themselves in desperate straits turned to the Soviet Union
and even later, Bob Dole named a man indebted to Russian mining interests to head up his outreach and "delegate counting" operations
.........................................
Of course Russia/ USSR has since the 1920's wanted to effect our elections.
What was different this time ?
Why does Trump and his people continue to lie ?
Even his sons
Russian involvement in the election is no longer something even rock ribbed Republicans deny.
The extent of it's effectiveness ... that is to be determined.
But, bear in mind the same people a year ago that told you there was interference are now connecting the dots to the extent.
Your pooh poohing seems a little outdated or
I think that is what is called whistling past the graveyard
...............
Kinda reminds me of Paul Wolowitz / Bush Admin claims on WMD vs Joseph Wilsons claims of WMD.
Wolfowitz had the bluster and the administration to back him up. (fox-Limbaugh-Talk Radio)
Wilson had, data.
For a while Wolowitz' BS ruled the day.
But who was right ?
The same people that backed Bush Admin/Wolowitz are virtually the same people pooh poohing Russian involvement.
When do we start a thread on lemmings -- just asking
Can we revisit those thread annually?
Again, I never said that there was no chance Russian fingerprints were on the election in any shape, form, or fashion. Feel free to prove me wrong. If you want accolades for being 'right' about that you can slink back to your echo chamber for a free cookie.
Oh really?
Come on.
Stake claim to a reality. Do you believe that the Russians stole the election? Do you believe Trump is a patsy?
Stole, I don't know about that because we aren't privy to all of the facts yet. Trump a patsy ? Who does he owe money to -- he is doing his damnedest to keep the public unaware
This is the kind of thing we were actually arguing about 10 months ago. Let's keep it in perspective instead of trying to score some intellectually lazy points.
Score points ? Points of what --- and should I get the most points what do I win? Will Sav anoint me King of Etherworld ?
Nah, I just wanna see poor people keep access to mammograms and maintain safeguards against the effects of Industrialization .
Which was kinda at stake in the last election
Russia has begun "military exercises" along the Ukraine border.
Russia has more to gain from us than we have to gain from them. Has been the case since 1917 and is the case in 2017
That my friend is a "not debatable"
You like Trump appear to be terrible poker players
I don't agree with the new sanctions.
The 'information' you are weakly insinuating is from Russia is actually better described as geopolitical common sense. We stand more to gain from a closer relationship with both Russia and Putin. That's not really debatable.