Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

I don't expect anything.
Things take their course.

Further Obama and HRC investigations are pointless . If there ever was a point it was long ago exhausted.
 
57Brave said:
I don't expect anything.
Things take their course.

Further Obama and HRC investigations are pointless . If there ever was a point.
Click to expand...

There is a point and its to expose the hypocrisy and corruption that is the left. To me and 100's of millions of people world wide that matters. You won't be able to sweep this under the rug if Trump is not found to be colluding with Russia.
 
There is no law against being a hypocrite and corruption is based on statued crime
Try as they might over the past 30 years illegalities have not been proven nor have any allegations passed legal muster concerning HRC.

Indictments are based on law
 
And there was gross negligence in the HRC e-mail investigation and we still have much to learn about the Obama administrations aggressive use of spying on US citizens.
 
A Republican House,Senate,Supreme Court and Executive Branch have forsaken these claims.
There is no there there.

Apparently the "Spying" was within the law.
We are a people of laws -------- right ?

OJ went free --- why?
He was found not guilty.
In what?

A court of law by a jury of his peers.

you can argue all day long about why that jury in that court of law found him not guilty but end of the day, he was not guilty
...........

This isn't hard to understand
 
this read:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics...s-for-pence-and-other-senior-trump-officials/

The bottom line is that Pence, as vice-president elect, made remarks that concealed a questionable Flynn interaction with Russia that was actually approved by the transition team that Pence himself was in charge of. The question now is: Was Pence a witting participant in this plot? And if not, who are the senior Trump aides named in the Mueller document who allowed this cover-up to occur?
 
thethe said:
Even if you don't believe the investigation is tainted where do you think all these leaks came from in the past 18 months? Trump supporters within the FBI?
Click to expand...

Could honestly be pretty much anybody. Trump's Administration doesn't seem to be the most cohesive bunch.
 
Runnin said:
That's because it's not as newsworthy, as the slight overstep by the reporter, who apparently is known for being overzealous in his reporting, is not that big of a deal. It's just a dot we can't quite connect yet.

As for the reporter being overzealous, you should empathize.
Click to expand...

Haha wow I think you've officially reached 57/goldy status as completely delusional

Trump derangement syndrome strikes again
 
sturg33 said:
Haha wow I think you've officially reached 57/goldy status as completely delusional

Trump derangement syndrome strikes again
Click to expand...

Are you surprised at this? Did you see the reaction to the original fake news report from ABC? This was the Xth time of 'This is big'?

After the major Flynn indictment was shown to be a big nothing now they are circling the wagons and trying to figure out how to attack Trump next. Sadly, we are going to be playing this same game for another year at the very least.
 
has the bill gotten to the millions wasted on Bill getting a blowjob and the money wasted on the countless times they looked into Benghazi for Hillary?

just curious

weird how people keep lying and making deals/possibly going to jail if nothing at all happened
 
I think you guys will testify that I have had precious little to say about the whole Trump/Russia thing, in fact I really haven't had all that much to say about Trump at all, at least I don't believe I have said that much about him.

As for the Russia thing I think I've been pretty consistent in saying that once they show me some actual hard evidence I'll be happy to join the "pitchfork and torch party", but in the meantime I'll leave it up to you guys.

With that said, for those who are sick and tired of the constant drama and constant "hard hitting investigating" going on and can't remember any time when your side acted like that, I offer this:

 
Hawk said:
Also, a point of clarification, the Baier indictment story involved the Clinton Foundation not the candidate. Obviously, certain elements ran with that baton of inference, but still.
Click to expand...

So do you (and you, thethe) think the NY FBI source(s) who "leaked" the imminent indictment story right before the election were on the level? Do you think it's analogous to a member of the Mueller team privately expressing a political opinion? Are you prepared to say that the Clinton Foundation investigation was in no way politically motivated, even though it was reportedly initiated based on allegations in a Mercer/Bannon-backed book?

Bear in mind, Mueller's guy was pulled from the investigation, and if he did anything else, we'll find out because apparently he's going to be investigated by the DoJ IG.

So there's accountability there. Just as there was for Brian Ross's corrected report.

Has there been any accountability for the FBI personnel who fed Baier a fake story? For Baier? For Fox with regard to the retracted Seth Rich story which was designed to publicly undercut the Russia investigation? It's really hard to take the woe-is-us claims of taint and bias seriously if you're only willing to consider one side.

It's fine to ask those questions, and it's obvious that doing is so is part of the PR strategy to push back on the investigation. Clinton did the same thing, albeit less ham-fistedly than Trump ranting about the FBI on Twitter. It's less fine to assume you know the answers.

To some degree, it's all just akin to working the refs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top