I thought you weren’t prepared to prosecute.
So you feel comfortable going with two instances of (as of now) tangential perjury. Ok.
Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
I thought you weren’t prepared to prosecute.
So you feel comfortable going with two instances of (as of now) tangential perjury. Ok.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
You asked, I answered. That's what's there now, in an investigation that is ongoing . . . versus the one at issue, which is over. So, please continue to bark up that tree in hopes that the varmint will mysteriously reappear.
My entire interest in engaging you on issues related to Trump and Russian collusion has been to taper expectations that the varmint is indeed a rabid opossum and not just a house cat. You've seen red eyes and foam around the mouth from the get go.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Sure, which argument he's done absolutely zero to advance.
I think he's pointed out instances which could (arguably) serve as adequate grounds to warrant additional investigation, or at the very least an independent investigation of the FBI's general practices.
As I've said before, we have different interpretations of the scope of adequate grounds. Are there adequate grounds to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election? Yes. Are there adequate grounds to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election as it relates to direct collusion with the Trump campaign (proper)? I don't see as natural of an intersection here as you do. There are 'dots' (to borrow from nscapi) and if they connect ... then, yes, I concur with your "so be it" sentiment. But they better be damn good dots and not peripheral acquaintances.
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Here's the latest on the hoax.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/07/polit...-emails-after-trump-tower-meeting0359PMVODtop
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/07/polit...-emails-after-trump-tower-meeting0359PMVODtop
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
No comments on this one? What did home boy think was so eerie related to the news of the DNC being hacked? Must have been some kind of discussion about adoptions.
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Well thethe told us the other day it was just because they're incompetent.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
This is actually the exculpatory theory I find most plausible.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
There is something weirdly haphazard about the nature of some of the contacts revealed so far. As I've posted before what seems to have happened is more in the nature of an elaborate dance in which the lead dancer switched back and forth, but over the course of the dance the parties established that they had a mutual interest in working together. It does not appear to have been a business-like deal with a memorandum of understanding or anything of the sort.
Whatever the real nature of the collaboration a full investigation is in the public interest.
And I think the pre-history (before Trump became a candidate) of financial links between him and Russian entities needs to be looked at. The question of whether he developed a financial dependency (as Manafort did) on Russians or Russian entities needs to be investigated. Deutsche's 300M loan in 2010 to a guy with his track record and who just a couple years earlier had experienced difficulty with the same bank just does not pass the smell test. Ditto for some of the more recent loans to Kushner.
Once you qualified mills/abedins lies I knew nothing I could show would make a difference. This is obviously on party lines and you're not only comfortable with it but happy that partisan leftists are prosecting this fake scandal.