Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

It's always telling when Trump doesn't tweet about something major in the news this long.

There have been a few days like this during his Presidency where his lawyers force him not to tweet about an on-going current event. This and Comey's testimony are two that really stand out.
 
sturg33 said:
Nobody. My point is that Manaforts has been around a long time. He's a slime ball

And there are probably hundreds just like him
Click to expand...

Yeah. But Trump is in a special class all his own in terms of stupidity and cupidity. I don't think all the swamp denizens are equally slimy. There are gradations and distinctions worth making. I suspect that there are not hundreds "just like" Manafartov.

And it is my hope that those Trump defenders capable of reflection will do some some soul searching.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
Yeah. But Trump is in a special class all his own in terms of stupidity and cupidity. I don't think all the swamp denizens are equally slimy. There are gradations and distinctions worth making. I suspect that there are not hundreds "just like" Manafartov.

And it is my hope that those Trump defenders capable of reflection will do some some soul searching.
Click to expand...

You're asking too much.
 
sturg33 said:
Lol with the cartoon.

Again, I didn't even notice the faces until a website circled them and said "look at the faces"

So Julio's logic says "look how Ron Paul is so racist. He posted this blatant racist photo, then when shown the faces, he pulled it down because he's so racist!"

So guy is bold enough to post blatant racist picture on purpose, but not bold enough to keep it up?

Y'all would be a lot healthier if your default position wasn't that person has to prove they are not racist
Click to expand...

So, uh, I guess you and everybody else in Ron Paul’s office failed to notice that every figure depicted in that cartoon was a racist caricature straight out of Der Sturmer? But what you’re actually, straight-faced arguing is that he’s very much not racist because he took it down? Dude, just take the L.
 
Yeah, a hook-nosed yarmulke-wearing guy, a buck-toothed yellow-hued fellow, a seedy Latino and liver-lipped Jim Crow steroetype are in no way racist.

Cuz, yannow, he took the tweet down which means actually the opposite of what posting it in the first place means.

You’re deep in the woods, my dude. Just own it.
 
Ron Paul is actually an anti-racist hero for deleting a disgustingly racist tweet sent out in his name. I wonder, did he fire the staffer that was responsible? Surely that would’ve been the right move. I wonder if that happened.
 
Cogent analysis of Mueller's strategy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...nags-his-golden-goose/?utm_term=.b8a784f16762

The fact that Mueller is farming out things like the [Tony] Podesta, [Vin] Weber and [Gregory] Craig cases — and even the Michael Cohen case, which also went to SDNY — reinforces the idea that Manafartov is still seen as a potentially key figure in the Russia collusion case. And that goes for basically anything else Mueller has apparently kept under his purview, up to and including the Seychelles meeting, Erik Prince Superstar, George Nader and Roger Stone. Mueller has now shown he’ll hand off multiple things that don’t further that specific aim, and everything that hasn’t been handed off would logically still seem potentially pertinent to the collusion probe.
 
Julio3000 said:
[tw]1013808908027219968[/tw]

Nobody noticed the faces!
Click to expand...

When I saw the tweet, my attention was drawn to the cultural Marxism... Until a separate tweet like you posted here literally zooms in.

So in Julio's world, Ron Paul posts a racist tweet on purpose, but then decide he should take it down bc someone noticed?

Lol
 
" President Trump’s former campaign chairman pleaded guilty on Friday to two charges, while prosecutors dropped five others.
It was not immediately clear how the plea agreement might affect the investigation by the special counsel, Robert Mueller, into Russian interference in the 2016 election. "

I am still uncertain the difference between plead/pled and pleaded

Had I been editor I would have published


" President Trump’s former campaign chairman pled guilty on Friday to two charges ... "



Can you help Hawk ? I just can't seem to square this in my brain
 
Um, like you need to zoom in to see it. This has passed the point of absurdity. So he gets credit for posting a racist-ass tweet then deleting it. Dude, just stop.
 
Julio3000 said:
Um, like you need to zoom in to see it. This has passed the point of absurdity. So he gets credit for posting a racist-ass tweet then deleting it. Dude, just stop.
Click to expand...

You don't need to zoom in to see it, but I didn't look at their faces til I was instructed to.

Lol im not giving him credit. I'm just thinking logically rather than emotionally like usual.

ONE PUBLIC COMMENT OR VOTE? JUST ONE. shouldn't be hard. He is a blatant racist so this one should be a layup for you
 
nsacpi said:
Cogent analysis of Mueller's strategy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...nags-his-golden-goose/?utm_term=.b8a784f16762

The fact that Mueller is farming out things like the [Tony] Podesta, [Vin] Weber and [Gregory] Craig cases — and even the Michael Cohen case, which also went to SDNY — reinforces the idea that Manafartov is still seen as a potentially key figure in the Russia collusion case. And that goes for basically anything else Mueller has apparently kept under his purview, up to and including the Seychelles meeting, Erik Prince Superstar, George Nader and Roger Stone. Mueller has now shown he’ll hand off multiple things that don’t further that specific aim, and everything that hasn’t been handed off would logically still seem potentially pertinent to the collusion probe.
Click to expand...

Personally, I hope that the other offices run with the prosecutions of the lobbyists, lawyers, and consultant-types, regardless of party or ideological affiliation. They’re all bad, and have been feeding from the same nasty trough for too long.
 
sturg33 said:
You don't need to zoom in to see it, but I didn't look at their faces til I was instructed to.

Lol im not giving him credit. I'm just thinking logically rather than emotionally like usual.

ONE PUBLIC COMMENT OR VOTE? JUST ONE. shouldn't be hard. He is a blatant racist so this one should be a layup for you
Click to expand...

Sorry, buddy. The cultist line doesn’t work here. I understand that it’s all you’ve got, but that doesn’t mean I have to play.

Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. It’s realky that simple. You have to be willfully blind—and ideologically blinkered—not to get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top