I think what’s missing from public view is direct evidence of quid pro quo. That could be because it doesn’t exist, or could be because it was effectively obscured.
One more question to add: why would he violate his cooperation agreement with Mueller by lying about his interactions with Kilimnik.
It’s going to be hilarious when this thing turns out to be exactly what it looked like at the time.
Prosecutors said for the first time that they have evidence of Roger Stone communicating with WikiLeaks, according to a new court filing from special counsel prosecutors.
During its investigation of the Russian hack of the Democrats, "the government obtained and executed dozens of search warrants on various accounts used to facilitate the transfer of stolen documents for release, as well as to discuss the timing and promotion of their release," the prosecutors wrote Friday to a federal judge.
"Several of those search warrants were executed on accounts that contained Stone's communications with Guccifer 2.0 and with Organization 1," which is WikiLeaks.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/15/politics/roger-stone-wikileaks/index.html
National Emergency or Nothing Burger?
Sounds like a fun new game we should play in this forum.
We knew about Stone sending Julian Assange DMs in 2016.
Nothing burger deluxe.
But ... but ... collusion/conspiracy/collaboration/calamity/corruption and a laundry list of unrelated and inconsequential fringe grifters/theives/crooks/liars/idiots.
Rise repeat.
today's filings references "several" accounts containing Stone's communications, a likely indication the information goes beyond what has already been revealed
The representment of information that is passed as new finding has been a common theme around these parts.
The representment of information that is passed as new finding has been a common theme around these parts.