Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

[Tw]1098203561584984064[/tw]

Deep state Coup

and yet they informed the gang of eight which is both sides of the aisle and they didn't see a reason to be concerned

should tell ya something but like everything else on this investigation and people lying and going to jail etc you will ignore and gaslight
 
[Tw]1098418244900261888[/tw]

The left can pretty much be defined by fake outrage. And now they dont even think the Mueller report is the end all. Just a running joke from non serious people.
 
[Tw]1098418244900261888[/tw]

The left can pretty much be defined by fake outrage. And now they dont even think the Mueller report is the end all. Just a running joke from non serious people.

i wish i really had nothing to do but show the amount of tweets and crying and bitching and threats your boy posted trying to say it was fake and needs to be shut down while all these people keep going to jail around it

it would almost be worth it to show your lunatic stance to believe what you wrote

but i seriously don't have that time right now in my life
 
[Tw]1098418244900261888[/tw]

The left can pretty much be defined by fake outrage. And now they dont even think the Mueller report is the end all. Just a running joke from non serious people.

I assure you that Robert Mueller is a serious person and he's not joking.
 
[Tw]1098418244900261888[/tw]

The left can pretty much be defined by fake outrage. And now they dont even think the Mueller report is the end all. Just a running joke from non serious people.

When a car salesman knowingly sells you a lemon (Iraq- WMD)

who would go back for more then claim that salesperson "serious"
 
So you will accept his findings no questions asked?

What choice does anyone have? I've already said several times that I think the Justice Dept will ultimately protect itself and the Presidency. I think they'll cut a backroom deal and tell us what they think we should know, like they always do.

I think if they have the goods on him, so to speak, they won't try to flog him in public, but will force him out and make him declare that he won't seek re-election. He'll say there's too much BS in govt, claim victory and quit.

If they don't have the big overwhelming smoking gun, it will be really messy as the obstruction and general corruption investigations already underway will never end.
 
Last edited:
What choice does anyone have? I've already said several times that I think the Justice Dept will ultimately protect itself and the Presidency. I think they'll cut a backroom deal and tell us what they think we should know, like they always do.

I think if they have the goods on him, so to speak, they won't try to flog him in public, but will force him out and make him declare that he won't seek re-election. He'll say there's too much BS in govt, claim victory and quit.

If they don't have the big overwhelming smoking gun, it will be really messy as the obstruction and general corruption investigations already underway will never end.

You believe that these typea of shenaningans happens behind the scenes but refuse to believe that the fbi could potentially setup a president to committ a coup? Seems inconsistent
 
It was a crime to fire someonr who is under the executive branch? Really?

the crime in that particular instance is suborning the obstruction of a duly constituted investigation

why did McGahn threaten to resign if all that was happening was a president properly discharging his constitutional duties
 
the crime in that particular instance is suborning the obstruction of a duly constituted investigation

why did McGahn threaten to resign if all that was happening was a president properly discharging his constitutional duties

Because it was a stupid decision but not a crime. Why dont we just take away all of the presidents constituional powers?
 
Because it was a stupid decision but not a crime. Why dont we just take away all of the presidents constituional powers?

We will see. I think a lot will turn on whether the president can be shown to have acted with corrupt intent.
 
We will see. I think a lot will turn on whether the president can be shown to have acted with corrupt intent.

When you move inyo judging intent you eliminate fact based determination and have lost your argument. It is 100% not a crime for the president to fire any employee within the executive branch. What is unconstituional is giving a special counsel immense anount of powers which were not given by the people.
 
When you move inyo judging intent you eliminate fact based determination and have lost your argument. It is 100% not a crime for the president to fire any employee within the executive branch. What is unconstituional is giving a special counsel immense anount of powers which were not given by the people.

actually the determination of intent can be inferred from various things...such the letters and interviews surrounding the firing of Comey
 
Back
Top