zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
2) explain how the DoJ’s position from 2000 is “active”
I'm not gonna have this cyclical argument again all night where you think you win by moving the goalposts enough that you forget where I started,
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/422474-the-president-isnt-too-important-to-be-indicted