Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Fake news - Never attacked a disabled man for being disabled. He has used that voice and gestures for many others in the past

You guys are so consumed by the fake news bubble.

You're credibility just went into the negative. Everybody saw Trump make fun of that man for being disabled, just like he implied Megan Kelly was just some bitch on her period.
 
bear in mind a cornered rat knows he is a --- cornered rat.
I think it psychobabble diagnosing Trump a "narcissistic" ****, he is a con man. A circus barker
no more --- no less


Nicole Hemmer
‏Verified account @pastpunditry

As a presidential scholar who works in the Nixon White House tapes:

at this point, the only reason Trump isn't Nixon circa late-1973

is Congress and conservative media.


https://twitter.com/pastpunditry/status/1118949684033269762
 
This thread aged well.. LOL A gold-mine of comedic confirmation-bias ineptitude for the ages. And it's still going.
 
When the report is a complete victory for you:

[tw]1119207303700471809[/tw]

[tw]1119211274712375297[/tw]
 
Absolutely airtight source here.

Hahahaha...yout 'side' has been wrong about all aspects of this, specifically the parts pertaining to Papa.

First the dossier was pushed. When it was found to be aources from russians and fake there was no speak of it again from the left.

Then it was papa who really started the investigation until of course we learned mifsud was western intelligence.

You dont get it do you? This was an Obama admin hit job to overthrow an elected president. Someday youll admit to yourself what happened.
 
imagine seeing this report and thinking the president did nothing wrong

thethe is a lost cause for truth and this country
 
Please tell me what he did wrong.

couple things come to mind

1) Negotiate a lucrative slice of a real estate deal in Moscow while lying repeatedly to the voters that he had no business dealings with Russia.

2) Order Don McGahn to shut down an investigation of which he and his campaign are the subject.

would it have been ok for George McGovern to be negotiating a hotel deal in Hanoi while campaigning to end the war? don't think so

was it ok for Nixon to ask the CIA director to tell the FBI to call off its investigation of the Watergate burglary? don't think so
 
couple things come to mind

1) Negotiate a lucrative slice of a real estate deal in Moscow while lying repeatedly to the voters that he had no business dealings with Russia.

2) Order Don McGahn to shut down an investigation of which he and his campaign are the subject.

would it have been ok for George McGovern to be negotiating a hotel deal in Hanoi while campaigning to end the war? don't think so

was it ok for Nixon to ask the CIA director to tell the FBI to call off its investigation of the Watergate burglary? don't think so

it's totally helpless with that white supremacist

he just gas lights and projects

it doesn't matter what his boy does, it was someone else fault etc
 
couple things come to mind

1) Negotiate a lucrative slice of a real estate deal in Moscow while lying repeatedly to the voters that he had no business dealings with Russia.

2) Order Don McGahn to shut down an investigation of which he and his campaign are the subject.

would it have been ok for George McGovern to be negotiating a hotel deal in Hanoi while campaigning to end the war? don't think so

was it ok for Nixon to ask the CIA director to tell the FBI to call off its investigation of the Watergate burglary? don't think so

First one you have an argument

The second one was within his cobstitutional right and since it was found to be a hoax he should have done it.
 
First one you have an argument

The second one was within his cobstitutional right and since it was found to be a hoax he should have done it.

The president has the constitutional right to end an investigation. But he may not do so with corrupt intent. I think that part is generally accepted.

The part where people part ways is whether in directing McGahn to end Mueller's investigation, Trump was acting with corrupt intent. I don't think it is a close call.
 
The president has the constitutional right to end an investigation. But he may not do so with corrupt intent. I think that part is generally accepted.

The part where people part ways is whether in directing McGahn to end Mueller's investigation, Trump was acting with corrupt intent. I don't think it is a close call.

Corrupt intent? For wanting an incredibly distracting investigation to stop because he knew it was based on a lie?

How can you possibly argue corrupt intent knowing muellers conclusion on collusion/conspiracy?
 
Corrupt intent? For wanting an incredibly distracting investigation to stop because he knew it was based on a lie?

How can you possibly argue corrupt intent knowing muellers conclusion on collusion/conspiracy?

1) Any investigation of this sort is distracting.
2) Mueller's investigation was properly predicated. None of Trump's DOJ appointees or legal advisors (as far as I know) have argued otherwise.

So yes, corrupt intent. Not a close call imo.
 
1) Any investigation of this sort is distracting.
2) Mueller's investigation was properly predicated. None of Trump's DOJ appointees or legal advisors (as far as I know) have argued otherwise.

So yes, corrupt intent. Not a close call imo.

Properly predicated? When we know FISA warrants were issued based on the dossier? When spying on Papa didnt even have to do with Russia?

How in any world was this predicated on real proof?

2.5 years later and there is no actual proof. You have papa (fbi setup) and trump tower meeting (fusion setup). Oh yeah, some flimsy argument about business dealings.

If thats all it takes to start an investigation we are all ****ed
 
My favorite thing from the report thus far

Seeing all the things he and his administration said was fake news and mueller found it to be true

Not that I didn’t already know this about the piece of **** liar

But still made me laugh
 
Last edited:
a732726044df01379474005056a9545d
 
Back
Top