Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

All this fuss will lead to nothing.

But if it feeds your ego, have at it.

Vote him out but if you continue to do this, he will win and I would not like that even though he has been the best president for our economy and that is something hard to beat.
 
nsacpi said:
I don't think they saved him. If a general orders the massacre of a village and the soldiers refuse to fire, I believe the general is still guilty of a crime. If a mafia boss orders a hit and somehow the target survives, I believe that is also still a crime. If my neighbor shoots at me three times and somehow misses, he is still guilty.
Click to expand...

The phrase “corrupt intent” seems made for him.
 
59628740_1553726174762345_5047437693584146432_n.jpg
 
Were the CIA or NSA able to listen in on Trump's call to Putin? I certainly hope so. The man cannot be trusted.
 
57Brave said:
Asking all of the exoneration-ers
why doesn't Trump want Mueller to testify under oath ?
Click to expand...

It is a virtual certainty that Mueller will testify. I would say the latest from Trump on this is yet another example of his skills when it comes to to shooting himself in the foot.

Ben Wittes has come up with a couple of useful phrases to summarize it: malevolence tempered by incompetence and Keystone Kops Kollusion
 
nsacpi said:
It is a virtual certainty that Mueller will testify. I would say the latest from Trump on this is yet another example of his skills when it comes to to shooting himself in the foot.

Ben Wittes has come up with a couple of useful phrases to summarize it: malevolence tempered by incompetence and Keystone Kops Kollusion
Click to expand...


If mueller did take the stand and say there’s no proof of collusion would you drop it and finally get over it?
 
to my mind if "exoneration" was anything besides a bumper sticker --- Mueller testimony on live TV would be a victory lap.
Saying this on the day Michael Cohen is going to prison --- for lying
about Trump affairs
 
Krgrecw said:
If mueller did take the stand and say there’s no proof of collusion would you drop it and finally get over it?
Click to expand...

I'm happy to have a serious discussion of Mueller's findings with anyone who has made a good faith effort to process them.
 
thethe said:
Effectively the same things that we have been discussing for years.
Click to expand...

sorry my friend but I would never mistake what happens around here for a good faith discussion...it is actually the opposite of what a good faith discussion would look like...not that I mean to imply that I am without some share of the blame for that state of affairs
 
I waa referring to the topic of discussion. Its very clear that biases evlnter the discourse around these parts
 
Still no rationale for Mueller no textfying, as Trump would favor. No defense for Trump notion I see

What does exoneration mean then ?
Because Mueller details / dismisses the term "collusion"
,,,,,,,,,,,

I dont see what bias has to do aith the written record.
 
57Brave said:
Still no rationale for Mueller no textfying, as Trump would favor. No defense for Trump notion I see

What does exoneration mean then ?
Because Mueller details / dismisses the term "collusion"
,,,,,,,,,,,

I dont see what bias has to do aith the written record.
Click to expand...

it seems to me this is yet another attempt at obstruction...albeit of the shambolic and ultimately ineffective variety
 
Last edited:
When do those that demand personal rexpnsibility take responsibility for Trump and the things he says.
I am asked to take responsibility fow what some random Muslim does across the planet because I am opposed to a Muslim ban.
Or asked to take responsibility for MS-13 because I oppose Trump border policies.

At what point do his supporters take responsibility for his npnsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top