Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
idiots like Justin Amash?
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Their polling probably told them there were better issues to push.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Hopefully we can start with the Chairman of that committee Lady G.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
We’ve been telling you that for a long time
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
The SSCI report is the closest thing we'll get to an assessment of the counterintelligence elements. It should be noted that like Mueller the SSCI opted not to delve into very poorly chosen one's financial affairs, the red line that he drew.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://lawandcrime.com/politics/ro...-ties-left-fbi-in-dark-about-decision-report/
Rod Rosenstein prevented them from looking at financial ties.
Rod Rosenstein prevented them from looking at financial ties.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckr...judge-to-end-criminal-case-no-questions-asked
And the Flynn case is going back to Judge Sullivan. Flynn loses again. Only 2 justices voted for him and those were the 2 from the previous hearing.
And the Flynn case is going back to Judge Sullivan. Flynn loses again. Only 2 justices voted for him and those were the 2 from the previous hearing.
57Brave
Well-known member
Peter Strzok 8/18/20
1/ Today’s bipartisan SSCI report - and each Republican Senator signatory - conclusively debunk Barr’s mendacious assertions that the FBI’s investigations were based on “a very thin, slender reed,” which “should have been obvious to anyone, that there was nothing there.”
2/ These senators describe at enormous length the counterintelligence nightmare we at the FBI confronted in the
@realdonaldtrump
campaign in 2016. In so doing, they validate the premise.
3/ While criticizing some of the FBI’s investigation, the report overwhelmingly verifies on a bipartisan basis that this was no witch hunt; it was not, as Barr has called it, “political spying”; and it was in no sense a hoax.
4/ I was concerned the legal scope of the SC’s work wouldn't address the purely CI aspects of what occurred. In fact, the Mueller report notes it didn't, but returned them to the FBI.
The Senate report, by contrast, makes clear those CI concerns were significant and pervasive.
5/ Were the CI aspects of the investigation ever seriously examined by the executive branch? This actually remains unclear. The report does not say whether the FBI ever engaged in a wide, comprehensive effort like the Senate’s to understand the CI aspects of Mueller’s work.
6/ It actually raises a far more troubling question: whether the FBI did enough to understand Russia’s actions and whether ongoing efforts have been chilled or even quashed in a climate in which the attorney general is denying the premise that investigation was even warranted.
7/ As Trump RTs
@GovernmentRF
propaganda and suggests meeting
@KremlinRussia_E
before the election, it begs one last question: whether the USIC is now positioned to understand the dire consequences of a president whose behavior poses a mountain of still-unanswered CI concerns.
1/ Today’s bipartisan SSCI report - and each Republican Senator signatory - conclusively debunk Barr’s mendacious assertions that the FBI’s investigations were based on “a very thin, slender reed,” which “should have been obvious to anyone, that there was nothing there.”
2/ These senators describe at enormous length the counterintelligence nightmare we at the FBI confronted in the
@realdonaldtrump
campaign in 2016. In so doing, they validate the premise.
3/ While criticizing some of the FBI’s investigation, the report overwhelmingly verifies on a bipartisan basis that this was no witch hunt; it was not, as Barr has called it, “political spying”; and it was in no sense a hoax.
4/ I was concerned the legal scope of the SC’s work wouldn't address the purely CI aspects of what occurred. In fact, the Mueller report notes it didn't, but returned them to the FBI.
The Senate report, by contrast, makes clear those CI concerns were significant and pervasive.
5/ Were the CI aspects of the investigation ever seriously examined by the executive branch? This actually remains unclear. The report does not say whether the FBI ever engaged in a wide, comprehensive effort like the Senate’s to understand the CI aspects of Mueller’s work.
6/ It actually raises a far more troubling question: whether the FBI did enough to understand Russia’s actions and whether ongoing efforts have been chilled or even quashed in a climate in which the attorney general is denying the premise that investigation was even warranted.
7/ As Trump RTs
@GovernmentRF
propaganda and suggests meeting
@KremlinRussia_E
before the election, it begs one last question: whether the USIC is now positioned to understand the dire consequences of a president whose behavior poses a mountain of still-unanswered CI concerns.
Last edited:
Runnin
Well-known member
There's only one reason Rosenstein would've blocked the FBI from determining that OO was NOT a Russian asset - it would've opened a giant, ugly can of worms and likely been impossible to do.
This is HUGE. OO financial interests are inextricably bound to Russian money and the Kremlin. Everybody knows this but nobody knows what can be done, other than erect a wall around the Oval Office to protect the govt as much as possible. The day OO demanded that Jared and Ivanka get top secret security privileges was the day the Intelligence Community had to begin protected the country from the President.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
There is a lot of irregularities with Trumps finances. Like why was Deutsche Bank loaning him money when he was a terrible risk. Theres also the issue of buying and then reselling to Russians for a hefty profit.
Reminds me of the Kilimnik situation. He was considered a "sensitive source" by the Obama State Department and worked with us for years. Now, he's supposedly a Russian intel officer that possibly helped Russia steal info from the DNC server even though we're not even 100% sure Russia was the culprit. It possibly could be true about him but it's never been conclusively proven but yet somehow it's fact now. There's a good reason the House investigation never came to the same conclusions as the Senate's did. The Senate's investigation has the same holes and leaps of logic that the Mueller investigation did.